Today, I saw in my circle of friends that the company with 55 degrees of Rococo generation has the patent protection of this cup, which is the patent that Xu Rui said. There is a complete document (201320414841_ soopat patent search) on soopat, and the application number is 2013204148465438+. It is not subject to real trial, which means that his rights are actually unstable. If you really want to rely on this patent to protect your products in practice, the possibility is quite small and it is easy to fail. I think this is also the reason why Rococo made a statement, but there is nothing to sue. In short, the cups made by these principles belong to the prior art. In addition, if Xu Rui says that the improvement point of the rococo cup is the change of the phase change material, especially the phase change metal, but this patent is actually a utility model patent, it can't protect the improvement of the material, but his specification discloses the material (there is no claim to protect the material, as mentioned above, the new model can't protect the material), so it can be said that it has made a contribution to the public and anyone can use it.
In addition, it is found that the applicant is "Beijing Yimikang Technology Development Co., Ltd.", which has not been transferred at present and cannot drive the patent right in the name of Rococo or 55 degrees company. Of course, this new patent right is basically of little use as mentioned above.
In fact, there is no requirement that patents and products must correspond to each other. You can apply for a patent in principle, if it can be realized in principle. For example, if the cup is pure gold in principle, the effect will be better, then the patent can be written in pure gold, but it is definitely possible to actually manufacture it without pure gold! If someone else makes pure gold under the premise of pure gold patent authorization, it may be infringing. Of course, if you don't make this pure gold product, you can't advertise that it is a patented product.