Secondly, the claim of the fan includes the motor described in any one of claims 1 to 4, so there is no need to repeat the description.
Third, in the following description, there can only be more or less, that is to say, at least there must be plagiarism, and the more details, the better.
Fourthly, the abstract is relatively simple: the utility model relates to the field of xx, in particular to a motor and a fan containing the motor, which can … (product advantages), wherein the motor includes … (only the exclusive right of the motor is attached).