What are the judicial interpretations of the Supreme Court in handling patent infringement cases?

In order to correctly hear cases of patent infringement disputes, this interpretation is formulated in accordance with the Patent Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), the Civil Procedure Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) and other relevant laws and regulations, combined with the actual trial. Article 1 The people's court shall determine the scope of protection of the patent right according to the claims claimed by the obligee and the provisions of the first paragraph of Article 59 of the Patent Law. Before the end of the debate in the court of first instance, if the creditor changes the claim, the people's court shall allow it. Where the scope of protection of the patent right claimed by the obligee is determined by the dependent claim, the people's court shall determine the scope of protection of the patent right according to the additional technical features recorded in the dependent claim and the technical features recorded in the cited claim. Article 2 The people's court shall determine the contents of the claim as stipulated in the first paragraph of Article 59 of the Patent Law according to the records of the claim and the understanding of the claim by ordinary technicians in this field after reading the specification and drawings. Article 3 The people's court may interpret the claims by using the specification and drawings, the related claims in the claims and the patent examination documents. Where the specification has a special definition of the terms in the claims, the special definition shall prevail. If the above method can't clearly define the meaning of the claim, it can be interpreted in combination with well-known documents such as reference books and textbooks and the common understanding of ordinary technicians in the field. Article 4 The people's court shall determine the contents of the technical features expressed by the functions or effects in the claims in combination with the specific realization methods of the functions or effects described in the specification and the appended drawings and their equivalent realization methods. Article 5 The people's court shall not support a technical scheme that is only described in the specification or attached drawings but not recorded in the claims, if the right holder brings it into the scope of patent protection in a patent infringement dispute case. Article 6 The people's court shall not support the technical scheme abandoned by the patent applicant or patentee by modifying the patent claim or specification or statement of opinions during the patent authorization or invalidation procedure, and if the right holder brings it into the scope of patent protection in a patent infringement dispute case. Article 7 The people's court shall examine all the technical features recorded in the patent claim when judging whether the alleged infringing technical scheme belongs to the scope of patent protection. If the technical scheme accused of infringement contains the same or equivalent technical features as all the technical features recorded in the right claim, the people's court shall determine that it belongs to the protection scope of the patent right; If the technical features of the technical scheme accused of infringement lack more than one technical feature recorded in the claim compared with all the technical features recorded in the claim, or more than one technical feature is different or the same, the people's court shall determine that it does not belong to the protection scope of the patent right. Article 8 Where a design identical with or similar to an authorized design is used on a product identical with or similar to a patented design product, the people's court shall determine that the alleged infringing design belongs to the protection scope of the design patent right stipulated in the second paragraph of Article 59 of the Patent Law. Article 9 The people's court shall determine whether the product types are the same or similar according to the uses of the design products. To determine the use of a product, you can refer to the brief description of the design, the international design classification table, the function of the product, the sales and actual use of the product and other factors. Article 10 The people's court shall judge whether the designs are identical or similar according to the knowledge level and cognitive ability of ordinary consumers of patented products.