There are several defects in the claim of an emergency invention patent. What are they? The premise is that it will not exceed the scope after modification.

The situation of 1 is much more than the basic three-sex problem. There is no specific plan, not the object of protection, sentence problems, and a lot of,,,,

2. The modification is within the scope, that is to say, your modified claim must still be supported by the specification, that is to say, the scope cannot exceed the scope described in your specification. That is, the concept of superiors and subordinates,