Many companies can make themselves pay attention to patents, and they can also develop more patents. Patents can actually be transformed into economic advantages, and they can also allow some companies to gain more advantages. Many companies attach great importance to their patents.
Tencent can also develop more patents on its own, and it can also put these patents to better use. But sometimes Tencent's patents may have certain conflicts. Tencent's disclosure of spoiler identification and blocking patent has sparked heated debate. Is this a slap in the face for "advanced on-demand"? I think this is indeed a slap in the face. There are three main reasons why:
First, Tencent’s advance on-demand broadcast itself is a spoiler.
In fact, in my opinion, I think Tencent’s patent is really a slap in the face, because Tencent’s advance on-demand broadcast itself is a spoiler. If you want some people to avoid spoilers, you need to prevent some people from watching these plots in advance. But some people are able to watch it in advance, which means that there will definitely be spoilers, and even if this patent is invented, their plot will still be spoiled.
2. Tencent’s patents conflict with its own practices.
In my opinion, I think this is a real slap in the face, because Tencent’s patent itself conflicts with its own practices, and Tencent cannot stop its advance on-demand broadcasting. Since Tencent cannot stop, it means that Tencent cannot put its patents to better use, and it cannot stop its own behavior.
3. Tencent’s patents may not necessarily reduce spoilers.
One thing we have to admit is that Tencent’s patents may not necessarily prevent more actions, because some people can allow themselves to spoil the story in person, even if they do not do so online. You can also let yourself and others reveal spoilers when chatting. Tencent cannot stop it at this time.
The above is my opinion. Do you have any thoughts?