I've really studied this, mainly because of its purification effect, filter screen and environmental protection and energy saving. In the end, the Blueair air purifier is better. The first is the purification effect. Blueair air purifier combines electrostatic filtration and mechanical filtration, which can quickly and efficiently remove inhalable particles and allergens (such as pollen and pet hair). ), cigarette smoke, PM2.5 and other particles harmful to the lungs help purify indoor pollutants and allergens. Humidification and purification is one of the characteristics of Sharp air purifier, but it is also this characteristic that limits its purification effect. Sharp air purifier can only use physical filtration because of its humidification function, and the purification effect is naturally not as strong as the dual filtration of Blueair air purifier. Followed by the filter screen, the filter screen of Blueair air purifier adopts HEPASilent high-efficiency light filtration technology, which can effectively remove 0. 1 micron particles, harmful chemical gases and odors in the air. Sharp air purifier has no outstanding performance in this respect.
Finally, it is environmental protection and energy saving. In this regard, Sharp air purifier did not give any explanation, and the reason must be clear to everyone. When the Blueair air purifier runs for 24 hours in low gear, the power consumption is less than 1 kWh, which can be said to be very energy-saving and environmentally friendly.