No matter in school or in society, everyone has dealt with composition. The composition must focus on the theme and elaborate on the same theme. Don't ramble, the theme is lax or even without a theme. You always have no way to write a composition? The following is a debate composition I collected. Welcome to read the collection.
A debating composition 1 In the first class this afternoon, we had a debating contest. The theme was: Is it necessary to tell a white lie? Positive views are white lies, which are necessary and belong to one or two groups; There are three or four groups of opposing views that white lies are unnecessary. We are against each other.
The class began, and both debaters came to the stage with information, both rubbing their hands and having answers. At the beginning of the debate, both sides had a tense momentum. When it comes to free debate, the atmosphere on the field is even more intense. Half of the debaters on both sides were based on the information checked the day before, and half came up with it on the spot. When their tongues are not necessarily straight, they can still think of ways to attack and defend. This requires listening carefully to the speeches of local debaters at that time, thinking while listening, thinking quickly and reacting quickly.
For example, Xu, a student of quadrant debate, said, "In lesson 10, Don't starve that horse, the disabled youth also told a white lie, but after the lie was exposed, the author was grateful to the youth ..." Just when the audience thought that the opposing party could not stand it, Cai immediately got up and cleverly retorted, "Then he can also use a euphemistic tone to let the author study with peace of mind and explain it clearly to his father. Cai thought of it on the spot and gave a big counterattack to the front. After listening to Cai's speech, the audience was dumbfounded and applauded. But then, the audience in the square was a little lost and worried about whether the square debater could calmly deal with it.
Throughout the whole debate, the main positive point is that although white lies are also lies, their motives are good and they are a way to encourage people. In life, it is necessary for us to encourage people with white lies, but we must have a certain degree and get the right time and place. This is also my new understanding of white lies through this debate.
A Debate Contest Composition 2 Today, our class held a wonderful debate contest.
"Ding Lingling-"The ringing bell rang. The teacher came into the classroom with a smile and wrote the topic on the blackboard: Should Ceng Zi kill pigs? The classroom suddenly exploded and there was an argument. Some say yes, some sayno. Teacher Mao clapped his hands and the debate began!
First, enter the first link: the opening argument. Chen was the first to bear the brunt and said plausibly, "I think it is necessary to kill pigs, because honesty is the most important thing, but as soon as he finished speaking, he was shot by Mao." I only heard her say, "There is no need to kill anyone. The wife is coaxing the children, so it is impossible to be serious in joking. "If someone says that your father is a devil, do you really think that your father is a devil? "This retort, for example, gave the square a blow and gave them a duel!
In the second round, the pros and cons did not give in to each other and frequently attacked each other. Ask sharper questions than the other side, answer more skillfully than the other side, and overthrow the debate to a climax-free debate. My deskmate yelled and objected, "There is a limit to jokes." The opponent immediately said, "It's a waste to be an economic man and kill a pig just for a joke!" The students on the positive side were stunned. ...
Time flies. In a blink of an eye, it's time to make a summary speech. Not to be outdone, both sides have tried their best and released their own killer weapons. They are still tied. It's really "saying that the public is right, and the woman says that the woman is right"! Finally, the two sides had to shake hands and make peace.
What a wonderful debate! Let me understand that honesty is very important, but you must have an economic mind.
A Debate Composition 3 This is my first time to participate in a debate contest, which has some novelty and some gains.
Looking back on my junior high school life, it seems a bit monotonous. I've never participated in any contest before, let alone the debate contest called "high intelligence game", so I feel a little nervous and excited-after all, it's the first debate contest in school, when can I exercise myself and show myself?
Two days before the competition, I received a debate, and the time was a little tight, but everyone made full preparations. In response to the debate, we had many group debates. During the period, everyone exchanged views with each other and put forward many tricks to deal with their opponents. At the same time, they also try to figure out their own ideas from each other's point of view. In the competition, many opponents' arguments were the same as we expected, but unfortunately, before the competition, we only made a simple assumption, and due to time constraints, we were unable to make an in-depth analysis. At the same time, because of nervousness, well-prepared opinions are useless, and there are some episodes in the debate process, which lose the best refuting power when refuting the other side.
The first time I participated in the debate, the nervousness and lack of tacit understanding still disrupted our game rhythm. At the same time, our opponents are also very strong, and their views are very strong, which is well-founded to refute our views. However, we didn't admit defeat, so we fought with them. Although we lost in the end, we played the momentum of our class, and we will never admit defeat!
This debate, let me feel deeply, let me learn a lot of knowledge from it, and let me feel the strength of the team. If everyone is a drop of water, then when they come together, it will become a sea of Wang Yang.
A debate composition 4 heard a witty speech, saw a debater stand up and smelled a faint smell of gunpowder in the air. You must want to know, "What happened here?" Students will tell you in unison: "We are debating!" With the "start" of Mr. Shao, the debate will officially begin! First of all, the argument is over. After expounding their respective one-on-one fights and debates, the two sides entered the long-awaited free debate session.
The free debate has begun! I looked around excitedly and found that others were ready to show their skills in this link like me. The eyes of both sides are full of murderous look. There is no gap between sentences, and the figure of standing up and sitting down quickly dazzles me. The air is filled with the smell of gunpowder, like a spark will explode. Debaters talk like bullets! It's like trying to make the other side feel powerless to fight back. With the upgrade of "battle", the game has entered a white-hot stage. Looking at the argument between Bao Yi and Confucianism, my heart lifted. See Han Xiao eloquent, the in the mind secretly glad; Looking at Chen Yuying's eloquent refutation of Han Xiao's question, my heart hung up again; I was relieved to see David talking. My heart rises and falls with the debaters' speeches again and again. This short eight minutes has made me feel that it has been eight centuries.
Out of the "battlefield", the "war" officially ended, and the smell of gunpowder was much lighter. Maybe I will hold a debate in the future, but the intensity of this debate will never be forgotten.
Listen to composition 5 in the debate. What are the students chattering about? What are those people talking about? Oh, it turns out that the children in class 125 are debating! The heads of the lead debaters and the assistant debaters of our first and second groups were closely together, and the tension immediately dispersed. We closely discussed the "battle plan", "You, you and you will attack Peng Yu" and "You two will attack Nie" ... It turns out that the main debater Li Xueling is assigning work. We have a bottom in mind.
When the referee announced the beginning, the two main debaters came to the stage to state their views. Look, Li Xueling, our debater, walked on the stage with great composure, chattered endlessly, gave a glad eye, and then strode off the stage. The audience gave her warm applause. Nie, the main debater of the other side, calmly walked onto the platform, said a lot, and then swaggered off the platform. The applause of the audience can't be subsided for a long time. ...
Xu Haibo, the debater of the opposing side, gave us a duel at the beginning: "If you need a white lie in your life, then I ask you to abbreviate' Xiaoming told a white lie'. How to explain this? " This makes us speechless. Look at Xu Haibo again. He looks very proud. What about us? Cai Hongyi is thinking hard; Xu Ziguang is scratching his head, as if he would scratch something later. We whispered to each other, but we just couldn't think of any reason. Moreover, the referee also stipulated the time, and if you can't answer, you will be deducted one point. I thought to myself: it's over, it's over, it's over this time, hey! "Three, two ..." is the order of the referee. "Ah, I see!" At this critical moment, Li Xueling stepped forward: "The lies we are telling now have another attribute-kindness, which has completely changed the nature of lies." "Good, well said." Our applause has not subsided for a long time. ...
Although the debate has ended, it is still fresh in my memory, which has drawn a satisfactory conclusion for the debate. ...
Composition 6 of a debate contest is in class. Today, we finally look forward to the long-awaited debate. The pros and cons are divided into two rows, north and south, each with six people, lined up around the rostrum. With the topic "Is it beneficial to open the book", only listen to the director's command. At this time, the players in the square, like several soldiers on standby, are eager to try, as if they were ordered to go to the battlefield at once. Look at that heroic opposition. They seem to have answers. It remains to be seen who will die.
The debate began, and the square took the lead with preemptive tactics, only to see a smile on the corners of its players' mouths. But the opponent's first bullet was not bad, and our team resisted the opponent's powerful offensive in the form of famous sayings.
Seeing the audience's eyes wide open, our little rabbit's heart pounded and thought, No way, the other party has a "good show". The positive side said, "Books are still medicine, and good reading can cure fools." Unexpectedly, the opponent returned a bullet in the same way, and the bullets of both sides collided together, grinding out the spark of wisdom, which made me shine at the moment. I retorted that "medicine has three poisons, and books are no exception." Those who support and oppose all applaud, but the positive one still has nothing to hide, which makes me puzzled.
It's a bad thing that the professional players finally played the trump card. The morale of our army has dropped greatly, and the students who support both sides shouted, "Good! All right! Good! " People in the square even demoralized our army in a few words. Our team also gave them a blow, which was really beautiful. Zheng Fang was not so excited, but Zheng Fang still said: "Reading is like breaking thousands of volumes, and writing is like a god." We refute that "thousands of books is not as good as Wan Li Road to study". The opposing team members gradually changed from passive to active, and the students who supported each other cheered again. Some people even wrote the words "the other team will win" on cardboard.
After class, there is still no winner, but I understand a truth: in fact, the combination of positive and negative views is the perfect view, so I must read more books and read good books in the future.
A Debate Contest Composition 7 Today, our class held an unprecedented debate contest.
Boys' point of view is that it is beneficial to open the book at last, while girls' point of view is that it is beneficial to open the book. At the beginning of the debate, the girl first said, "Reading is like breaking ten thousand volumes, and the pen is like a god. Books are the nourishment of the whole world. Your writing will be better if you read more books. Edison is an example. He has read thousands of books, so he has many patents. Therefore, it is beneficial to open the book. "
As soon as the girl's words came out, the boy immediately disagreed. We said, "Books are still medicine. Good reading can cure fools. In fact, books are medicine, so we should distinguish good books from bad books. Good books, like good medicine, can cure diseases, while bad books, like poison, can only harm people. Therefore, opening a book may not be beneficial. Some students, because they are addicted to bad books, their academic performance declines. In the end, they were not admitted to key schools, but wasted their lives. Isn't this caused by bad books? A good book is like a street lamp, and a bad book will only ruin our future. We'd better stay away from those bad books.
Time passed like water and the debate was over. The teacher concluded: "There are indeed many bad books in life, so we must distinguish right from wrong and never read them.
This debate made me know the dangers of bad books and the benefits of good books, and told me not to read bad books.
A Debate Contest Composition 8 This debate contest is my first time to participate.
The theme of this debate is: Is it good or not? The balance of truth and the balance of strength seem to be inclined to "open books are not necessarily beneficial", because no one stands on the side of "open books are beneficial" when the teacher divides the seats. However, the plan has not changed as fast. A person gets up the courage to go to the square seat, and many hesitant students go to the square one after another. Now the number of the two sides is almost the same, and these people have brought pressure to our opposition.
Although the pros won from the angle and theory, they didn't seize the opportunity and passed it by. Why? Because they were not ready, how did our opponents win?
Personally, I think the opponent is right. Because "opening books may not be beneficial" includes both reading and opening books may not be beneficial. It is precisely because the opposing side firmly grasped this point and debated around it that victory can be achieved. Moreover, the other side is prepared, so that the front can only defend but not attack, thus constructing the fact that the final victory belongs to the other side. The square can only protect their last wall with a few pale words, and can only defend, not attack-reading cartoons is beneficial.
The opposing side can completely break through this last "wall", but the debate ends because the bell rings. But fortunately, the teacher ruled that the other side won!
A Debate Composition 9 "I declare the' Debate Competition' of Class 6, Grade 5 begins now!" Rao monitor said with a smile.
At that moment, the sunshine gradually softened and the classroom became silent. You must think: What is an "open-book debate contest"? You will know after reading it.
Our main debater, the affirmative, may be too nervous. As soon as he opened his mouth, he said, "It's good for us to open books." I was a little worried at first: if he was too nervous, it might affect his future performance. Ou Yi, come on!
The other debater is also very nervous. What he said was: "Opening books may not be good for us." Talk like a little girl. I seem to see the hope of victory.
Yiyi said: "Gorky once said that books are the ladder of human beings. If there were no books, we wouldn't have the present civilization. "
The national treasure panda does not show weakness. He wriggled and said, "There are good books and bad books now, and children nowadays simply can't tell the difference between good and bad. Often go astray! "
His move was useless, and we Beibei knocked him down. Beibei used a killer weapon, while keeping a straight face and gesticulating with her hands to strengthen her momentum: "If you have never been exposed to bad books, you won't have that kind of awareness of prevention, in case you suddenly go to see those bad books one day. That will definitely go astray! "
……
Finally, we won. Campus life is really colorful!
A Debate Composition 10 Today, our class launched a fierce debate around "opening books is beneficial" and "opening books is not necessarily beneficial". Because this is the first time we have held a debate, the scene is inevitably a bit confusing. Before the game started, the debaters had put on a self-confident shelf and seemed quite sure.
I'm more in favor of the opposition, because I don't think reading all the books is good for us. On the contrary, reading books that we shouldn't read is not good for our physical and mental health.
With the order of the host, the debate began, and the first and second debaters of both sides stated their views in turn. "We believe that reading can enrich our knowledge, so it is beneficial to open books." "We don't agree," the opponent quickly argued. "Read a book that is not conducive to physical and mental health? For example, what is the use of reading comics for our study? " At this time, I found some commotion in the square, and my heart was secretly pleased. After a while, the second positive argument retorted, "Comics can improve your ability to read pictures and write words."
"Now start a free debate!" The host announced, hey, this is even more interesting. You are eager to try one by one. You are tit for tat and will not give in to each other. This is the so-called "angry words". In the end, it was the opposition I agreed with that prevailed.
"Stop!" Teacher Wang, the head teacher, declared the debate over. "This time, I hope everyone can feel this process. Students should learn to take facts as examples and speak with facts. This time, the opponent won! " I'm so happy to hear the news!
Liu Xiang, a great poet, once said that "books are still medicine, and good reading can cure fools". I think this "good reading" has two meanings. One is to tell us to study hard, and the other is to tell us to read good books. Choosing good books can make us knowledgeable and intelligent. Bad books are like poison, which will make you lose your mind and damage your physical and mental health. So we must learn to distinguish and read only those books that are useful and healthy for us.
At the beginning of a debate composition 1 1, Cao Xun and I spoke as pros and cons respectively. I object. My view is that opening books may not be beneficial. Cao Xun is positive, and his view is that it is beneficial to open books. When we're finished, it's time to debate freely, and the real war is about to begin.
As soon as we come up, we'll say yes first. Zheng Fang's Wu Jiayi has long been famous, and she decided to take the lead in speaking on behalf of Zheng Fang. Wu Jiayi is really special. As soon as he came up, he challenged us with famous sayings. "Du Fu once said:' Reading is like breaking ten thousand volumes, and writing is like a god. Liu Xiang once said,' Books are still medicine, and good reading can cure fools.' Isn't it? "After this sentence, I added indignantly:" I have never seen anyone become a successful person without reading. "As soon as I finished, I was praised and applauded. Even standing on the other side, I couldn't help applauding her.
Applause is applause, and our opponents are not vegetarians. My good sister Lin Yushan immediately stood up and retorted, "Medicine is divided into good medicine and poison, isn't it?" How many people are fascinated by martial arts romance novels, leading to a decline in academic performance, failure in the senior high school entrance examination, and life has changed since then. How many young people have gone astray because they saw Hitler's Mein Kampf ... "
In this way, the pros and cons argue with each other and the city is in full swing. When I was excited again, suddenly a dozen people stood up and wanted to express their views.
I used to think time passed too slowly, but today I think time passed too fast. Maybe the old man changed his mount! After the end, Teacher Cheng concluded: "Reading is actually nine words-good reading, good reading and good reading." The debate was not only interesting, but also benefited me a lot. I like this kind of debate.
A debate essay 12 "I support the affirmative." "I support the opposition." Wow, what's wrong with this course? So noisy? Oh, so they are holding a debate!
And I am the leader of the opposition, and Shi Yiyin, the leader of the positive side, began to read his testimony of supporting science and technology. When she read, her voice was loud, and her big eyes were full of confidence, as if she had the determination to win. In her eloquent reading, we pinched a cold sweat for ourselves. It's my turn to read I secretly made up my mind and vowed to read better and louder than her and let them lose at the starting line first. So, I read aloud, and my heart didn't have a knot. Somehow, as soon as I finished reading, the students who supported us were very excited, and the applause continued until the teacher stopped.
Then the debate began. Team member Fang Haiyan slowly quoted the first evidence. Hearing this, Shi immediately stood up and refuted: "The tail gas emitted by cars contains ……" After the publication, Shi smiled as if celebrating the success of the rebuttal. Then, the square team members put forward the second evidence: "If the medical technology is underdeveloped, what about the patients?" So our Shi Hao stood up with a serious expression, pointed at the players in the square with one hand and said, "I don't agree with your idea. If there is no pollution caused by science and technology, how can people get sick ... "As soon as this question was thrown out, the scene was in chaos, and not only the people above got into a fight, but also the students below argued with it. Both sides were flushed and thirsty. Finally, the teacher asked our team leader to make a summary. As a result, we both began to compare who read better and who spoke more rationally, but in the end it was neck and neck. It is true that the public is right and the old woman is right.
Although we didn't win or lose this debate, we all fought fiercely, and all showed our voluble and generous side. I believe that science and technology are in our human hands, and only by rational utilization can we make it exert greater power.
A Debate Composition 13 When Teacher Fan wrote a few big characters about the debate on the blackboard, we cheered, because Friday was coming soon. Debate class one.
The argument is: Is it beneficial to open books? I agree, the view is that opening books is beneficial, and the third and fourth groups object, and the view is that opening books is not necessarily beneficial. Fortunately, I was appointed as the chief debater. I was so excited that I couldn't wait to start the debate at once. Teacher Fan began to talk about the rules, and I can't wait. I see that we are full of energy and confidence.
It's finally started. First, let's make a positive statement. With applause, our momentum was far ahead, but slowly they caught up. I was in a hurry and said my prepared opinion. At this time, Teacher Fan said, "The opponent won the first round." Listening to their cheers, I was very unhappy. I made up my mind to win this round and make them speechless.
The second round was more intense, and we were all anxious. Among them, Li Xitong impressed me the most. Although her grades are not very good, she is witty and flexible. Whenever the other party puts forward an idea, she immediately refutes it, making it clear and eloquent, which makes the other party admire. I was very happy at that time, and it also made me understand a truth: everyone has his own strengths.
Finally, when Teacher Fan said that sentence, he said, "The second round was a positive victory." I can't tell you how happy I am.
This debate not only exercised my eloquence, but also made me understand that "rationality is not high". You have to convince others with your own reason, that is the real champion.
A debate composition 14 today Tuesday, our class three or four had a debate in the classroom.
First of all, the pros and cons sent several representatives each. I,,, and Zhang are for the positive, while Zou Linzhi, Wang, Xie Tianyi, Cheng Ziqing and Wen Siyang are for the negative.
The host said: "Today, we are debating the pros and cons of" opening books is beneficial "and" opening books is not necessarily beneficial ".
Our "war" has begun! Zhang Wuhao Zeda
Stand up boldly and say, "I think it is beneficial to open books." Our mass media, well-known experts and young tutors also have the responsibility and obligation to remind them to read more good books, at least harmless books, and never read bad books. " Let them know that opening books may not be beneficial.
He spoke in a heavy tone, as if to say, "A tiger doesn't show hill and dew. You think I'm a sick cat! You wait and see! I certainly won't leave you alive. "
Not to be outdone, the other party asked Siyang to stand up and say, "I don't think it is necessarily beneficial to open books." It is true that reading can increase people's knowledge, cultivate people's temperament and cultivate people's body and mind, but "opening books" is only a necessary condition, not a sufficient condition. At the climax of the game, the audience Yan Guiyang stared at the pros and cons.
Cheng Ziqing looked at me with his eyes, as if to say, "surrender! You won't win. "
Finally, the host said, "The game is over. The debates between the two sides are very exciting, which has great enlightenment for our future study. We should always open useful books so that good books can accompany us to grow up healthily. "
This is really a war of words without smoke! The students blushed until they argued. Finally, Teacher Li announced that the two sides were tied. Teacher Li went on to say: "I hope that through this debate, everyone can have a clearer reading goal and method, read more books and read good books selectively." I believe that everyone will gain more! " "There will be debates in the future. Let's continue to work hard!"
A debating composition 15 People often say: "Open books are beneficial!" However, some people think that "opening books is not necessarily beneficial", but reading those unhealthy books is harmful. Our class had a heated debate on this issue.
The topics of this debate are "Opening books is beneficial" and "Opening books is not necessarily beneficial". Teacher Li, our head teacher, announced that the layout debate competition had officially started!
Chen, a classmate of ours, stood up and said, "I think it is beneficial to open books, because Gorky said that books are the ladder of human progress." This sentence once again shows that books can make people more knowledgeable and improve their articles and eloquence. "
However, our opponents disagreed. Bao, a gentle classmate, joked: "Now some teenagers have become addicted to martial arts and romance novels, thus neglecting their studies and reading some unhealthy books. Instead of benefiting, they embarked on the road of crime. "
During the debate, the atmosphere was very tense. Teacher Li made a summary on the podium. She was sure that the two sides had made full preparations for the debate, which was well-founded and not out of the ordinary. Then it emphasizes that "opening books is beneficial", but it also classifies bad books. Read a good book and stay with you all your life!
Wow, this is really a wonderful debate! Let the students exercise their eloquence, increase their knowledge and benefit a lot!
;