Lawyer Yao Kefeng is currently a perennial legal adviser to China Electronic Commerce Association, Sina.com, Qihoo 360, Youku.com, Tudou.com, Guo Jin Gold Group, HTC, Gaode Navigation (Gaode Map), APP, Chaoyang District Health Bureau and many other well-known units and websites.
Up to now, Lawyer Yao Kefeng has served in Tianji.com, Rong Baozhai, Xiao Xiong Online, CITIC Bank Credit Card Center, FedEx, Kohler Sanitary Ware, CLP International, Shiseido, Tongrentang, China Academy of Social Sciences Literature Information Center, China Construction Bank, Bank of Beijing, Zhongguancun Online, LeTV, Zhong Kai Culture, Shenzhou Commercial Enterprise, Hairun Film and Television, Youku.com, Qihoo 360, Phoenix.com, Tudou.com, Since, China Youth Network, China News Network, Legal Weekend, Chaoyang Health Bureau, HTC Mobile, Shanghai Insider, Shenzhen djinn, Henghui Precious Metals, Subang Technology, China Electronic Commerce Association, China Urban Development Research Association, financial circles and other well-known units and websites provide corresponding legal services.
Lawyer Yao Kefeng has represented a large number of intellectual property rights and Internet disputes with social influence, some of which are the first or innovative cases in China. The cases represented by lawyer Yao Kefeng include:
Represented Sina in copyright infringement disputes such as Beijing Youpeng Pule and Liaoning Northeast Website (the work "Mobile Phone" involved). In the case of losing in the first instance, the second instance decided to win Sina's case and rejected all the demands of Youpeng Pule (one of the typical cases of Beijing High Court 20 14 intellectual property rights, judicial protection and trial guidance of intellectual property rights are included in the first episode 2065438+05);
Acting for Qihoo 360 v. Shanghai Youth Daily (electronic version) reputation right case, which won the first instance;
Acting for the first copyright case of Internet set-top box in China-despite the expert theory certificate issued by many well-known experts and professors with opposite opinions, he still insisted on giving independent lawyer's opinions. In the end, the court of first instance adopted some suggestions of lawyer Yao Kefeng, and found that Jinglun was indirectly infringing, and LeTV won the case. After the appeal, the second instance adopted the lawyer Yao Kefeng's opinion and found that Jinglun had directly infringed, and the amount of compensation was doubled. Lawyer Le Shi won the second-instance judgment (the case was awarded the Top Ten Intellectual Property Case Award in 20 12 by the Intellectual Property Committee of China Lawyers Association).
Acting for Qihoo 360 v. Baidu Tucao 360 unfair competition case (this case was first banned by Beijing No.1 Intermediate People's Court and selected as 20 typical cases of unfair competition announced by Beijing No.1 Intermediate People's Court over the years);
Represents Sina. Xu Jieao was sued for a dispute over the right to reputation on the Internet (one of the eight typical cases of infringement of personal rights and interests by using information networks announced by the Supreme Law on June 9, 20 14).
Handling the unfair competition dispute of the sixth generation descendant of Tianjin Clay Fighter Zhang, the defendant won the first and second trials, and rejected all the plaintiff's claims (selected as 50 typical cases of judicial protection of intellectual property rights in China court on 20 12);
Organize the collective rights protection activities of HP notebook consumers against the quality problems of HP notebook products, set up a special lawyer group for HP notebook consumers' rights protection for the first time in China, and was elected as the head of the rights protection litigation group by the early team lawyers, so as to promote the quality problems of HP notebooks to the 3 1 15 party, and the facts involved were publicly reported.
The online merchant company applied to the Supreme Court for retrial on behalf of the copyright infringement dispute of Jiangxi Radio and Television, and the Supreme Court sent it back for retrial (the case overturned the previous standard of Jiangxi High Court that the rights of overseas film and television dramas were not protected, ending the situation that local overseas film and television dramas could not protect their rights);
Acting as the Supreme People's Court's agent for retrial of Gong's copyright case of culture, he was successfully sent back for retrial, which overthrew the previous determination standard of Korean drama rights by Hebei High Court and ended the judicial practice that local Korean dramas could not defend their rights;
In the case of Shanghai Meav Nuo Biotechnology Co., Ltd. v. Hunan Satellite TV, Youku.com and Tudou.com, the reasons for the defense of safe haven were put forward, and the court finally applied the safe haven to reject all the claims of Shanghai Meav Nuo against Youku and Tudou (the first case of exemption from safe haven was applied);
The first case of unfair competition dispute between travel websites (acting as an agent for tourist network to sue tourist network for unfair competition dispute involving travel strategy);
Acting as the first case of unfair competition in postgraduate training institutions in China (Wenhai Postgraduate v. Cross-examination Postgraduate Commercial Defamation of Unfair Competition Dispute Case, which won the first and second trials);
Acting for Qihoo 360 v. Baidu Weibo in the case of defamation of unfair competition (the first case of spoofing corporate logo in China constituted an unfair competition case, which won the first trial);
Acting as the agent for Qihoo 360 v. Baidu hao 123 website platform to publish news headlines to slander Qihoo's reputation for unfair competition (winning the case in the first instance and obtaining the highest amount of compensation for unfair competition for commercial slander in Beijing);
Acting for Youku Tudou Group v. Baidu's copyright dispute over a large series of pirated TV series (32 cases were won in the final trial and interviewed by CCTV twice);
The case of infringement of the right of portrait and name by the plaintiff (the court of second instance found that the counter-notification rule was effective, and ordered the video website to apply the safe haven exemption in the personality right, and the first case applied the safe haven exemption in the personality right);
Acting as the first patent dispute case after the implementation of the new patent law in China and the first patent dispute case in China furniture industry;
On behalf of citizens, the case against Shang brand franchise contract was successful, and the court ruled that the franchise contract was invalid (the first franchise contract dispute case after the promulgation of the franchise regulations);
Acting for the first case in China in which a blog sued the blog's reputation right;
Acting as the CEO of a legal website to apply for Tencent's anti-monopoly investigation to the State Administration for Industry and Commerce (invited to meet by the State Administration for Industry and Commerce for the first time due to anti-monopoly disputes);
Acting as the first online classroom fraud dispute case in China (the whole trial process is included in the CCTV legal channel "Trial Site");