Does China high-speed rail pay patent fees abroad?

Of course not. High-speed and high-price, low-speed and low-price, the people have their own needs, which has calmed the controversy of high-speed rail in one fell swoop, greatly facilitated people's travel, and promoted economic development and industrial transfer. How can it be called a big waste?

When the income of Chinese people is gradually in line with that of developed countries, low-speed and low-cost bullet trains will naturally be gradually eliminated.

The view of 1 layer is wrong. It cannot be said that the road was not built because of corruption. As we all know, if you want to be rich, you should build roads first. Aside from intellectual property issues, it is almost impossible to build roads without borrowing. But the loan to build a highway becomes a toll road, and once it is collected, it will be endless. High-speed trains can run cheap bullet trains, which is much better than expressways. Of course, whether it is a loan to build a road or a railway, the people will eventually pay the bill, but road construction is profitable, so the fees are endless. Building a railway is a public good, as long as it is not too costly. Therefore, it goes without saying that building roads or railways is more beneficial to the people. Of course, you can say that you can't build roads. Then, there is no need to develop the economy, and ancient people can survive, right?