Is the hydrological instrument reliable?

No, it's completely a national patent edge ball. After writing an article and paying the fee, I left a notice of patent preliminary examination and boasted that I was a patent.

In fact, it is not officially authorized by the patent office at all, and it is an invalid patent.

Simply put, anyone who wants to apply for a patent can first write an article and post it on the patent network, and then ignore the latter.

The purpose is to use people's ignorance of the patent application process to fool people.

Real patents need to submit accurate and true data to prove the practicality of the product, such as what data is before processing and what data is after processing. He doesn't just talk about how awesome his products are. He was notified by the preliminary examination on 20 17, and has not submitted the detailed patent data information for the next step, because he can't do the data. The purpose can be imagined, that is, to fool people who don't understand, and don't be cheated again.

As long as you think rationally, anyone who says that any disease is cured is a liar. Otherwise, is it for nothing that the country has trained so many doctors and researchers? Is it full to open a hospital to develop drugs?