The first trial did not say that the application for a patent for invention was not innovative enough, and I didn't know how to write it.

Patents require novelty, creativity and practicality. The examiner rejected the lack of novelty, so the patent writing was not good enough. What's the use of your hurry? . Besides, even if you want to reply, you don't know anything, and it's useless to go. The inventor had better communicate with your agent. .