Which car technology is better, German cars or Japanese cars?

Compared with Japanese cars, it is better than a topic. In objects, both of them have something to offer, whether in design, equipment or themselves. However, it is easier to lead to trends such as technology.

From a technical level, how big is the difference between Germany and Japan?

Japanese cars are known as the leaders in technology patents. The Toyota family's automobile patents account for one-tenth of the global automobile industry, and Toyota, Honda, and Nissan patents account for more than 70% of the global automobile industry. Including but not limited to some basic technologies that can subvert the automotive industry, such as hybrid, hydrogen, batteries, variable compression ratio, compression, thermal efficiency, 10at, etc., as well as these hard-core technologies, according to data from the German "Automotive News" : Japan's global leader in key automotive parts has 35,30,000 in the United States and only 18 in Germany. The famous British selection agency Tenth Road (a data provider of the World Intellectual Property Organization WIPO) also commented on Japanese cars: 'Toyota and Honda have always been the technology leaders in the global car industry, and Japanese companies have dominated the technology list for a year.

In addition, there is a technology that promotes a major step in the automotive industry: you can have large-scale, low-cost, high-quality mass production while ensuring your own profits. It is the ultimate technology of a true technology. This technology is from Japan's Toyota.

Low cost, high quality, both are generous, but low cost can also be high quality, mass production, these are many car companies, powerful, Ford, General, Mercedes, BMW etc. Only Japanese car factories. Only Japanese car factories make them. This involves not only management, basic industrial capabilities, but also the cultural culture of the Japanese, as well as the local culture of Japan, which is impossible.

This is also why it is a solid European and why it is not ideal for American car factories after learning this ultimate technology.

Let's take a look at Germany, which is less than improved technology, while hybrid, battery technology, SPCCI gasoline compression technology, etc. are not at all higher than the technology of the automotive industry.

For example, Porsche’s PDK dual-clutch technology is entirely Borg Warner’s technology. In addition to PDK, Porsche VTG is also developed with Borg Warner.

The public bought Borg Warner’s technology, so there are DQ250 and DQ500 wet dual clutches; the public also hopes to avoid Burg Warner’s technology, and discovered the DQ200 dry dual clutch, and discovered the DQ200 dry dual clutch. As a result, I want to know that it has become a legendary fool dsg, the glitches are constant and it is delicate. The quality of the car is good and the technical content is closely related. Parts can have high intensity, high pressure, high mountains and high heat, often reflecting the gap between basic industrial levels. Money can make luxurious interiors and diversified configurations. However, it is impossible to buy F22’s high-temperature material technology, and it is impossible to buy Japan’s fifth-generation single crystal.

Car materials, component materials, and improving the machining accuracy of parts require technological precipitation. For example, Toyota is now able to produce 41% of the thermal efficiency of its vehicles. This is due to breakthroughs in materials and processing technology. Toyota adopts the latest Developed wear-resistant, heat-resistant materials and laser-melted intake valve brackets to change the shape of the intake, plus the reliability and durability of new materials.

It is undeniable that the Industrial Revolution and the Literary Renaissance have brought a profound historical legacy to German automobiles. This Japanese car cannot be compared. But as a "scientist", without a home, the road of hard work will make Japanese cars have a harder core. Compared to both, the blessings of technology must be more real than the virtuality of virtuality.