How to collect invalid patent evidence

Legal analysis: To collect evidence of patent invalidity, we must first understand the determination of patent invalidity and collect factual evidence on this basis.

1. Collect evidence that the theme does not meet the conditions for patent grant, including: the theme of the invention or utility model is not novel, creative or practical; The theme of the design patent is not novel or conflicts with the legal rights previously obtained by others.

2. Collecting illegal evidence in the patent application: the description does not fully disclose the invention or utility model; The claim is not based on the specification; The modification of the patent application documents is beyond the prescribed scope; The subject matter of the patent right does not conform to the definition of invention, utility model or design; Principle of consultation authorization for simultaneous application; The granted claim is unclear, not concise or lacks the necessary technical features to solve its technical problems.

3. Collect evidence of violation of mandatory provisions of the law, including: violation of national laws, social ethics, or obstruction of public interests; Scientific discoveries and other legal provisions do not grant patent rights.

4. Collect evidence of repeated authorization: if two or more applicants apply for a patent for the same invention-creation, the patent right will be granted to the first applicant, that is, an invention-creation will only be granted to one person (the first applicant). Inventions, utility models and designs cannot be patented under the above circumstances, and those that have been patented may be declared invalid.

Legal basis:

patent law of the people's republic of china

Article 9 Only one patent right can be granted for the same invention-creation. However, if the same applicant applies for a patent for utility model and a patent for invention at the same time on the same day, and the patent for utility model obtained earlier has not been terminated, and the applicant abandons the patent for utility model, the patent for invention may be granted.

Where two or more applicants apply for a patent for the same invention-creation, the patent right shall be granted to the first applicant.

Article 22 An invention or utility model that has been granted a patent right shall be novel, creative and practical.

Novelty means that the invention or utility model does not belong to the prior art; No unit or individual filed an application for the same invention or utility model with the administrative department for patent in the State Council before the filing date, and it was recorded in the patent application documents published or announced after the filing date.

Creativity means that compared with the prior art, the invention has outstanding substantive features and remarkable progress, and the utility model has substantive features and progress.

Practicality means that the invention or utility model can be manufactured or used and can produce positive effects.

The existing technology mentioned in this law refers to the technology known to the public at home and abroad before the date of application.

Article 26 Where an applicant applies for a patent for invention or utility model, he shall submit the written request, specification and its abstract, patent right and other documents.

The request shall specify the name of the invention or utility model, the name of the inventor, the name and address of the applicant and other matters.

The specification shall give a clear and complete description of the invention or utility model, which shall be subject to the realization of the technical personnel in the technical field; Attached drawings shall be attached when necessary. The technical points of the invention or utility model shall be briefly explained.

The patent claim shall be based on the specification, and clearly and briefly define the scope of patent protection.

For inventions that rely on genetic resources, the applicant shall state the direct source and original source of genetic resources in the patent application documents; If the applicant cannot explain the original source, it shall explain the reasons.