(1) Market supervision and law enforcement forces need to be further strengthened.
First, the number of law enforcement personnel does not match the supervisory functions. Before the institutional reform, the former Quality Supervision Bureau, Salt Bureau, Price Supervision, Intellectual Property and other departments did not have agencies at the grassroots level. At present, most market supervision offices were established after integrating the former industrial and commercial and food and drug supervision offices, and their functions include Administrative licensing matters such as certificates and licenses, as well as full-scale supervision of industry and commerce, quality supervision, food and medicine, and commodity prices, as well as various market inspections, special rectifications, consumer complaints, law enforcement inspections, statistical reports, etc. Industrial and commercial supervision originally had the characteristics of a large number of supervision objects. After the "three-in-one" system adjustment, with the integration of quality supervision and food and drug supervision functions, the objects of supervision in the large market have become larger in size, coverage and complexity. It has been greatly expanded, but while its functions have been expanded, law enforcement personnel have not been supplemented accordingly. The city has 6 market supervision bureaus, 87 regulatory offices, and 997 administrative law enforcement personnel. Many regulatory offices only have 2 to 4 people, so the work is overwhelmed. For example, the Dongjin Market Supervision Office in Gangnan District only has two people on duty, and law enforcement officers are out enforcing the law, which often leads to complaints from the public that no one is on duty to apply for licenses. Therefore, grassroots departments still face considerable difficulties in achieving comprehensive and effective supervision.
The second is the mismatch between the profession of law enforcement personnel and the field of supervision. Regulatory departments at all levels generally lack professional knowledge and professional technical personnel in the fields of food and drugs, medical devices, special equipment, standard measurement and other fields. For example, Gangnan District currently has 211 medical device operating companies and about 627 medical device and drug user units, distributed in the urban area and 9 towns. However, the Gangnan District Market Supervision Bureau only has 5 people on the front line of drug and medical device supervision. Belongs to pharmaceutical professionals. Law enforcement personnel do not have corresponding professional academic backgrounds and have a single business knowledge system. They are stretched in the increasingly professional and standardized supervision work, which seriously restricts and affects the effectiveness of law enforcement and case handling.
Third, the age of law enforcement personnel does not match the supervision methods. Law enforcement personnel, especially grassroots supervisory personnel, are generally aging and are difficult to meet the current basic work needs of audio and video recording, computer operation recording, etc. of the entire law enforcement process, and are difficult to adapt to the needs of the new supervision model in the context of the "big market".
Fourth, the focus of law enforcement personnel does not match the supervision tasks. After the market supervision offices were placed under the management of townships (subdistrict offices), young and professional market supervision and law enforcement backbones were transferred or misappropriated to complete government work. The focus of work shifted, key supervision tasks could not be implemented, and there was already a serious shortage of market supervision. Law enforcement has been further weakened, grassroots supervision capabilities have declined, and the "last mile" of market supervision has been neglected. In addition to normal market supervision work, grassroots market supervision departments must also undertake more comprehensive tasks, including village settlement, demolition, health creation, assistance in handling petitions, straw burning ban, flood prevention, environmental protection, etc., which seriously affect statutory responsibilities The performance of functions increases the possibility of offside, misplacement, and absence of functions, and even the phenomenon of "double-down" occurs.
Fifth, the protection of law enforcement personnel does not match the needs of supervision. The standardization construction of many market supervision offices, especially those under the management of townships and towns (subdistricts), has been slow. The standard staffing, vehicle establishment, law enforcement funds, etc. of administrative units have not been implemented in place. There is a gap between the guarantee of law enforcement and work needs. The construction of the law enforcement team is seriously lagging behind. There is a large gap in law enforcement funds, law enforcement vehicles, law enforcement recorders, rapid inspection and testing equipment and other law enforcement equipment, which cannot meet the needs of regulatory enforcement and seriously restrict the improvement of regulatory efficiency.
(2) The issue of market supervision laws and regulations needs to be further resolved.
After the "three bureaus are merged into one", the administrative enforcement powers of the new market supervision departments are not organically connected with the existing laws and regulations. The legal basis for law enforcement entities is insufficient, and there is a risk of administrative reconsideration or litigation. After the institutional reform, they still use the previous law enforcement basis. The original industrial and commercial, food and drug, and quality supervision responsibilities overlapped. One case involves multiple laws, regulations, and rules. The application of the laws conflicts, making it difficult to determine the punishment. The promulgation of some market supervision laws and regulations has been slow.
(3) The efficiency of market supervision and government services needs to be further improved.
At the same time, we will strengthen the business learning and training of window personnel, realize the transformation of business level from "single subject" to "all subjects", and further improve the ability and quality.
(7) Increase funding investment. While ensuring the normal operation of administrative law enforcement supervision, we will promote the improvement of poor law enforcement equipment and enhance the frontline case handling capabilities by formulating unified standards for grassroots law enforcement equipment. For example, law enforcement officers should be equipped with law enforcement recorders according to standards, develop on-site law enforcement software support systems, and be equipped with rapid food testing equipment.
(8) Further intensify efforts to comprehensively and in-depth implement the three systems, and effectively improve the standardization level of administrative law enforcement by market supervision departments. Adhere to "taking openness as the norm and non-disclosure as the exception", establish and improve the disclosure mechanism before, during and after the administrative law enforcement, so that administrative law enforcement can operate in the sun and consciously accept the supervision of the masses. Establish and improve working systems for the collection, preservation, management, and use of recorded information throughout the law enforcement process, and give full play to the role of recorded information throughout the process in law enforcement supervision, public opinion response, administrative decision-making, and the improvement of the social credit system. The entire process of on-site law enforcement activities and law enforcement sites on health and major property rights and interests will be recorded audio-visually to promote strict, standardized, fair and civilized law enforcement in key regulatory areas. Comprehensively implement the legal review system for major law enforcement decisions to ensure legal administration. Urge law enforcement agencies at all levels to further implement the review subjects, determine the review scope, clarify the review content, and refine the review procedures to ensure that every major law enforcement decision must undergo legality review and maintain the legal bottom line.