However, if claim 3 mentioned in LZ refers to claim 2, claim 3 can further define the scope of protection.
For example:
1. A XX device (method) includes A, B and C, and is characterized by also including D. ..
The protection scope of this independent claim is: a+b+c+d.
2. The XX device (method) according to claim 1, further comprising e. ..
The protection scope of this dependent claim: A+B+C+D+E.
3. The XX device according to claim 1 or 2, further comprising F. ..
Scope of protection of dependent claims:
A+B+C+D+F or A+B+C+D+E+F.
In this case, claim 1 is an independent claim, and claims 2 and 3 are subordinate claims. The scope of protection of claim 3 further defines claim 1 and claim 2.