The Decision of the Supreme People's Court on Abolishing Part of Judicial Interpretation (Thirteenth Batch) was adopted by the Judicial Committee of the Supreme People's Court at its1768th meeting on May 20, 2009. It is hereby promulgated and shall come into force as of July 20, 20 19.
the Supreme People's Court
July 8, 2065 438+09
Decision of the Supreme People's Court on Abolishing Some Judicial Interpretations (Thirteenth Batch)
(Adopted at the the Supreme People's Court Judicial Committee's1768th meeting on May 3, 20 19, and implemented as of July 20, 20 19. [20 19] 1 1)
In order to adapt to the development of the situation and ensure the uniform and correct application of national laws, according to the relevant laws and the actual needs of the trial, it is decided to abolish the judicial interpretation of 103 (the catalogue is attached). The abolished judicial interpretations are no longer applicable as of the date of implementation of this decision, but the previous judgments and rulings made on related cases based on these judicial interpretations are still valid.
This decision shall come into force on July 20, 20 19.
Attachment:
Catalogue of partial judicial interpretations that the Supreme People's Court decided to abolish.
(thirteenth batch)
No. Title Date of Issue and ReasonNo. 1 the Supreme People's Court's Reply on How to Distinguish the Original Judgment1September 957 13 The social situation has changed and is no longer applicable. 2 Detailed Rules for Reception of Visits by the Supreme People's Court Letters and Calls Office1On June 20, 980, the Supreme People's Court Letters and Calls Office was revoked, which actually became invalid. 3 the Supreme People's Court's Notice on the Trial Implementation of the Form of Court Proceedings Law Fa Fa Fa [1992] 18, the Supreme People's Court's Notice on Printing and Distributing the Form of Court Criminal Proceedings (Sample) and the Form of Administrative Proceedings (Trial Implementation), and the Supreme People's Court's Notice on Printing and Distributing the Standard for Making Civil Judgment Documents of People's Courts. 4 the Supreme People's Court's Answers to Several Questions about the Style of Court Litigation Documents (Trial)1April 2, 19931Fa Ban Fa Fa [1993] No.3 "Notice of the Supreme People's Court on Printing and Distributing the Style of Court Criminal Litigation Documents (Sample) and Administrative Litigation Documents (Trial)" has been issued. 5 Notice of the Supreme People's Court on Giving Full Play to the Judicial Function to Guarantee and Promote the Transformation of Operating Mechanism of Industrial Enterprises Owned by the Whole PeopleNo. 65438+No. 1993 [1993]No. 13, the social situation has changed and is no longer applicable. Notice of the Supreme People's Court Municipality on printing and distributing the Interim Provisions of the people's courts on filing cases.
Attachment: Interim Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on People's Court Filing1April 2, 9971Fa Fa Fa Fa [1997] No.7 has been replaced by Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning People's Court Filing. 7 Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on the Fees and Time Limit for Examination of Foreign Arbitral Awards19981KLOC-0/410.65438+Interpretation [1998] No.28 Civil Procedure Law and Measures for Payment of Litigation Fees. 8 the Supreme People's Court's provision No.20131.00.21.00 Law Interpretation [2013] No.26 has been replaced by the Supreme People's Court's provision on people's courts publishing judgment documents on the Internet. 9 Notice of the Supreme People's Court on People's Courts' Strong Support for Tax Collection and Management19891.04 Law (Hangzhou) No.31989 is in conflict with the Criminal Procedure Law and the Administrative Procedure Law. 10 the Supreme People's Court's reply on how the people's courts refer to the rules and regulations lacking the basis of laws and regulations when trying administrative cases.
1994 65438+ 10/0/3 Faxing Fu Zi [1993] No.5 has been abolished by the Regulations on Highway Safety Protection and is no longer applicable. 1 1 the Supreme People's Court's official reply on whether the administrative act implemented by the administrative organ according to the notice of court assistance in execution falls within the scope of administrative litigation of the people's court. July 3, 2004 13 Law Interpretation [2004] No.6 has been replaced by the Supreme People's Court's Interpretation on the Application of the Administrative Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China. 12 "Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Jurisdiction of Administrative Cases" has been stipulated in the Administrative Procedure Law and related judicial interpretations. 13 the Supreme People's Court's reply on the qualification of administrative subject of road administration institutions and the application of relevant laws19951.05 [1994] No.4 compound word basis has been abolished by the Regulations on Highway Safety Protection and is no longer applicable. 14 telephone reply of the Supreme People's Court administrative trial court on whether the court should accept the residential surveillance lawsuit filed with the public security organ 199 1 criminal procedure law has been stipulated on may 25th, 15 "the Supreme People's Court's answer on whether the defendant's court can participate in the trial when the administrative organ simultaneously commits two specific administrative acts of restricting personal freedom and sealing up property against the same party in the same fact" has been written by the Supreme People's Court. 16 supreme people's law?