This paper expounds the differences and relations between intellectual property rights and intellectual property law.

This question is not a legal question, but a theoretical question. If it is an essay question, it can be answered from the following angles:

The relationship between them is dialectical and unified, with both differences and connections.

contact: 1. the content is the same, including patent right, trademark right and copyright.

2. They belong to the same category and belong to the field of intellectual property.

differences: 1. different concepts: intellectual property is a kind of right to protect intellectual property owners, while intellectual property law is the general name of legal norms to adjust and regulate legal acts between subjects in the field of intellectual property.

2. Different in nature: intellectual property is a kind of right, while intellectual property law is a legal norm.

in short, intellectual property rights depend on the protection and realization of intellectual property law, and intellectual property law depends on the existence of intellectual property rights.

ps: I don't know who came up with this topic. It's not scientific. It's basically two different things. How can we compare it? If we have to analyze the relationship between the two, we might as well start from the above point of view, but the difficulty should not be low, but it is quite boring.