Let's be a popular science writer, because popular science books are designed to stimulate children's curiosity, and scientists may lose a lot of interest once they are rigorous. In order to stimulate children's enthusiasm for independent thinking, it is the most crucial thing to keep them "surprised" about everything. From this point of view, it is very necessary to create the series of books "Euseburn Look Inside" from the perspective of children. For example, there are birds chirping, tigers chirping and frogs chirping in audio books, piano books can play music in books, dulcimer books can make beautiful sounds with small taps, and so on. Bai Bing thinks that these books can let children enter a wonderful world of popular science wholeheartedly and experience different feelings. But at the same time, not everyone can write popular science books. "It is equally important to find scientific theoretical support.
science is very useful, but it is difficult to understand. Yongchun Zheng, who is known as "Uncle Mars", first mentioned people's prejudice against science. Many people associate science with many formulas, terms and codes, and even think that science is very useful, but they also do bad things, such as genetically modified or petrochemical pollution, chemical plants, which are some impressions of children on science.
In China, popular science writers are the main ones who create popular science. Although they have certain scientific literacy and some knowledge of related fields, compared with scientists, they still lack real research experience, and it is difficult to feel the wisdom and spirit in research personally and deeply understand the mysteries of the scientific world, so it is difficult to truly describe the beauty of science.
Few scientists are engaged in popular science book writing or other popular science education. Bie Biliang said that not many people in the academic circle are willing to do popular science, which is of course due to the limited energy of scientists, but the more important reason is the restriction of evaluation mechanism. The performance evaluation of scientific and technological workers is still based on the amount of funds for scientific research projects and the number of academic papers and patents. The part-time work of scientific researchers in popular science works is neither workload nor work achievement, which can be said to be neither nameless nor beneficial, and it is thankless.