If the technical solutions are consistent, then it stands to reason that the same technical problems can be solved. Especially for the creative judgment of claims, the factors to be considered are whether they belong to the same technical field and the technical scheme adopted, and then the technical problems to be solved will be judged according to the different technical characteristics in the technical scheme. Having said that, it can be seen that the examiner objectively analyzes the technical problems solved by comparing the application with the existing technology when making creative judgments. If even the technical solutions are basically the same, then it can be considered that the existing technology can solve the same technical problems. Therefore, it is not optimistic whether you are creative when applying for a patent.
Moreover, in the case of more specific technical indicators, the scope of protection is generally narrow, which belongs to the scope of protection of broad claims and affects its creativity.
To sum up, I think it is basically not creative when the technical fields are the same and the technical schemes are very similar.