This article is a summary of the debate views on the 11.16 episode of Qi Pa Shuo. Of course, this summary is based on personal understanding after watching it and does not completely represent the complete will of each guest. If If you want to know more details, please watch the show.
The reason why I want to make such a summary is because I think this debate topic is quite interesting. I thought that if I could take away the examples, emotions, and humor, and think about this debate topic solely from viewpoints and logic, What will it be like
Yang Qihan - Summary of arguments:
1) ***Sharing knowledge can narrow the gap between rich and poor
2) Don’t be afraid, Deny technology, should we bravely embrace technology?
Zhao Yingnan - Summary of arguments:
1) Once this technology, which allows everyone to enjoy the knowledge of all mankind in an instant, is implemented, there will be consequences Many absurd phenomena have an impact on human ethics
2) This technology destroys the existing fair structure, obliterates individual efforts, and allows people who have not put in the effort to gain for nothing
3 ) Possessing all knowledge will make people lose interest in the world, invincibility will bring loneliness, while the hazyness of ignorance and curiosity about simple things will bring us more fun
4) This Technology will allow us to see clearly that the difference between us and others does not lie in hard work, but in unchangeable genes, hurting our self-esteem and making us powerless
Gao Qingyi
Refuting Zhao Yingnan Second point: This technology does not bring unfairness, because everyone getting something for nothing is a sign of civilization
Summary of argument:
1) This technology allows us to not waste time on Instead of memorizing and understanding knowledge, we should do more meaningful things based on the knowledge reserves of all mankind, and focus on creation and thinking.
2) This technology allows us to get rid of limitations and explore our limits
Fu Seoul - Overview of the argument:
1) Knowing too much Knowledge is not necessary, ignorance brings little pleasure
2) This technology weakens the advantages of knowledge-based vested interest groups and makes these people mediocre
3) This technology makes people become Similarity, obliterating people’s individuality and reducing differences between people
4) If this technology is used by bad people, it will bring disaster
Chen Ming
Concept distinction:
Information - is an external objective fact
Knowledge - is the induction and summary of external objective laws
Wisdom and ability ——Processing and application of knowledge
Refuting Fu Seoul:
1) Refuting the third point: Knowledge will not obliterate human diversity, because knowledge will not affect our choices
2) Refute the fourth point: We cannot obliterate the development of technology because we are wary of human nature
3) Refute the first point: Different knowledge backgrounds and frameworks bring different perspectives on problems perspective, bringing you unimaginable fun
Summary of argument:
Ignorance costs us innocent lives, but the enjoyment of knowledge can save lives
Zhan Qingyun - Overview of arguments:
1) Sharing knowledge does not bring us ability. Ability comes from the process of learning knowledge, and sharing knowledge in one second Knowledge omits the process of learning and thinking, and this process is what truly makes us successful.
2) Knowledge that enters our minds directly and believes it to be true makes us lose the right to question and choose.
Cai Kangyong - Summary of arguments:
1) Knowledge monopoly zone Come disaster
2) The popularization and dissemination of knowledge can inspire and entertain people
3) Sharing knowledge in one second can break the restrictions of geography and conditions
4) Patents and monopolies can be exploited and hinder scientific development
Xue Zhaofeng - Summary of arguments:
1) Knowledge monopoly can reduce cost losses, and the patent system avoids inefficiency and Waste
2) Knowledge is the wisdom that exists in the brain. It must be screened, judged, and used to turn information into wisdom, and we cannot omit this process.
3) Without the process of communication and confrontation, there will be no generation of new knowledge. It is not advisable to directly obtain the results and omit the process
Gao Xiaosong-Argument Summary:
1) Scientific and technological progress makes human beings more equal
2) Human beings can always find differences
3) The sharing of knowledge can reduce the friction in pursuing ideals
Li Dan - Overview of arguments:
We support technology, but we do not support decisions that attempt to create a perfect world
Liang Wendao - Overview of arguments:
1 ) The proliferation of patents brings many disadvantages
2) Knowledge should have trade-offs, and omniscience may not be a good thing
The arguments between the pros and cons mainly focus on three aspects:
p>1) Technology - what will technology bring us? What should be our attitude towards technology?
2) Knowledge - What is knowledge? How should knowledge be obtained? What are the pros and cons of ignorance and omniscience?
3) Ownership - is sharing necessarily good, but monopoly necessarily bad?
The contestants’ debate mainly focused on technology and knowledge, while the instructor introduced the topic to the level of monopoly and exclusive sharing.
This debate topic is very controversial in the definition of knowledge, so it has also produced many different interpretations and debate angles.
The above content is to clarify the logic and opinions, for your reference, and to express my own support for this program.
Discussions welcome