Opinions:
(1) Whether it meets the definition of invention stipulated in Article 2 of the Patent Law, that is, a new technical solution proposed for a product, method or improvement thereof. (2) Whether it complies with the provisions of Article 5 of the Patent Law, that is, whether the subject matter of the patent application violates national laws, social ethics, or harms the interests of the public;
(3) Whether it complies with the Patent Law The provisions of Article 25, that is, whether the subject matter of the patent application falls within the scope for which patent rights cannot be granted; (4) whether it has practicality as stipulated in Article 22, Paragraph 4 of the Patent Law;
(5) Whether the description fully discloses the subject matter requested for protection in accordance with the requirements of Article 26, Paragraph 3 of the Patent Law;
(6) Whether the technical solution defined in the claim meets the requirements of Article 26 of the Patent Law; Novelty and inventiveness as stipulated in Paragraphs 2 and 3 of Article 2; (7) Whether the claims clearly and briefly define the scope of protection requested in accordance with Paragraph 4 of Patent Law 26 and based on the description , whether the independent claim expresses a complete technical solution to solve the technical problem;
(8) Whether the modification of the application document complies with the provisions of Article 33 of the Patent Law and Article 51 of the Implementing Rules ;
(9) Whether the divisional application complies with the provisions of Article 43, Paragraph 1 of the Implementing Rules of the Patent Law;
(10) Whether the claims are not unitary;< /p>
(11) For inventions and creations that rely on genetic resources, it is also necessary to review whether the application documents comply with the provisions of Article 26 of the Patent Law