Summarizes the differences between Lenovo and Huawei in technology research and development.

It's not incomparable, but it's totally unnecessary. Huawei and Lenovo have completely different growth models. Huawei can do its own research and do its best, but it is not good at acquiring outstanding small companies in the field (not companies, but independent research laboratories). Although it will get twice the result with half the effort in research and development, Huawei headquarters has always mastered this core technology, and the long-term research effect will become remarkable. Lenovo adopts the mode of comprehensive acquisition and partial pit filling. From Lenovo's acquisition of Motorola and ibm, it can be seen that Lenovo takes the strategy of acquiring large companies with high value and low price, and there is no suitable acquisition target in the insufficient areas, and then fills the hole by itself. This can save a lot of energy and cost, and to some extent, it can also enhance the company's mobility. But for now, Huawei's obsession has defeated Lenovo's merger, but this is temporary and the future outcome may be uncertain.