Why do most rich people have low academic qualifications?

In fact, success depends on IQ, EQ, social experience, unique vision, divergent thinking, courage and persistence, which has nothing to do with academic qualifications. On the contrary, the higher the academic qualifications, the more I believe in book knowledge, and the IQ is enough, but the EQ is generally low, the social experience is very little, and the vision may be unique, but the divergence of thinking is too limited. As for persistence and courage, the higher the academic qualifications, the more people will feel "great" It is what we call "conceit". Dr. Tsinghua's request for others to change their names is a good example. Therefore, most people with high academic qualifications work for others, rather than starting their own businesses, and their own businesses are rarely successful.

On the other hand, those "successful people" can be divided into three types, one is highly educated (very few), the other is to start a business after graduating from college (at least half of them are not related majors), and the other is low-educated (even many primary and secondary schools have not graduated).

there is a prerequisITe for starting a business with a high degree of education, that is, you have mastered one or more patents. In some enterprises with "non-patent rigid demand", you can hardly see entrepreneurs with a high degree of education. To put it bluntly, you can make money with "science and technology", but this is also the case with patents in China. From the Nobel Prize winning situation, you can see the status of Chinese patents in the world ...

After graduating from university, you will start to make money, which are basically IT-related industries. For example, the Internet, mobile communication equipment, computer equipment and other related industries, which are "the rigid demand of modern society", are basically in the "golden age" when the network era has just started, so they are developing well.

The last one with low academic qualifications, such as infrastructure, real estate, retail, production, agriculture, light industry and other industries that have a great relationship with people's livelihood, is characterized by their older age. They generally don't need any patents, and they produce some fast-moving consumer goods. For a populous country like China, these industries have great markets.

Don't talk about things abroad. The concepts of education and social environment consumption in foreign countries are very different from ours. Many foreign universities are free of charge and even give living allowances. They pay more attention to students' personalities and are good at guiding students' "divergent thinking" rather than "memorizing formulas". Therefore, their technology is so developed. Comparatively speaking, they are more handy in making money with "technology", which is our shortcoming.

Most of the rich people mentioned above are highly educated ... I'm afraid I haven't investigated them ... Highly educated people usually work for bosses with low or middle education, and they are not "successful people". They are rich, but their initiative is too poor, and it depends on their bosses whether they can continue to work. Those who don't have fixed assets are at best "senior wage earners", and the rich people who are serious basically look at "fixed assets"

I think of "formula crosstalk". I am highly educated, arrogant and self-righteous. I think that society can be calculated by "formula". And those "experts", all highly educated, but what do they say and do? Most of the highly educated people are actually a group of people who are divorced from society ........

Nowadays, graduating from college is not a highly educated person, but it is not a rich person to graduate with a master's degree, and it is only a few tens of millions of fixed assets. After all, the price is now ... Hehe, with an annual salary of one million, you can't afford a half-suite in a prime location, not to mention the money for car maintenance ...

Of course, relatively. It's rich to earn tens of thousands of dollars a month, but it's nothing in the whole social environment ...

Oh, by the way, I won't say much about those senior officials, their official careers, and things within the system ... can't really get on without a certain relationship ... emmm .. It's ok to be a secretary or something ... Of course, they pay more attention to connections, and they can make up for it later in their education ... Oh, yes, "further study"!