What are the eight situations in which the burden of proof is inverted? Which do you think is the most important?

One. ? Eight cases of inversion of burden of proof;

1. Patent infringement lawsuit caused by invention patent of new product manufacturing method. Units or individuals that manufacture the same product shall bear the burden of proof that the manufacturing method of their products is different from the patented method;

2. In an infringement lawsuit that causes damage by highly dangerous operations, the injurer shall bear the burden of proof for the fact that the victim intentionally causes damage;

3. In the lawsuit of compensation for environmental pollution damage, the injurer shall bear the burden of proof on the exemption reasons stipulated by law and the fact that there is no causal relationship between his behavior and the damage result;

4. The owner or manager shall bear the burden of proof for the tort lawsuit that the building or other facilities, as well as the shelving and hanging objects on the building collapse, fall off or cause damage.

5. In an infringement lawsuit that causes damage to people by raising animals, the animal breeder or manager shall bear the burden of proof that the victim is at fault or the third party is at fault;

6. In the tort lawsuit of personal injury caused by defective products, the producer of the products shall bear the burden of proof for the exemption stipulated by law;

7. Tort litigation that causes damage to others due to the same dangerous behavior;

8. In the tort litigation caused by medical behavior, medical institutions should bear the burden of proof that there is no causal relationship between medical behavior and damage results, and there is no medical fault.

Legal basis:

Article 50 of "Several Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Evidence in Civil Proceedings" stipulates that the people's court shall serve a notice of proof on the parties in the preparatory stage before the court session. The notice of proof shall specify the distribution principle and requirements of the burden of proof, and may apply to the people's court for investigation and collection of evidence, and the people's court shall specify the time limit for proof according to the circumstances of the case, and the legal consequences of providing evidence after the time limit.

2. I think the most important thing is that the animal breeder or manager shall bear the burden of proof that the victim is at fault or the third party is at fault in tort litigation caused by raising animals. Nowadays, keeping pets is more common. In order to restrain the laissez-faire behavior of animal owners or managers and create a safer public environment, it is necessary to standardize the daily management behavior of animal owners or managers.