I wrote it myself, there is absolutely no plagiarism, the content is true, I will give you a hard fee if I forget to accept it.
As told by yesterday’s news, there is strong dissatisfaction among students from China and other countries as well as private students. Our country has entrusted the relevant person in charge to submit a statement to the relevant department, WHO, which has been approved by the WHO. Here I want to clarify one point: Most of them mean 99, which means that they basically believe that this standard is adopted from the Chinese acupuncture standard. Citing the original text, this standard is established as the Chinese international standard for acupuncture. The degree standard of 99 is the same as that of a Korean expert. The above is serious.
The customization of this standard happened in the late 1990s, that is, in 1998. The standard 99 adopted at that time was the Chinese standard. When the standard was formulated, both Korean and Japanese academic circles came out. Experts and students worked together to formulate it. 99 of them are from China. Only 1 is from South Korea or Japan. We are not yet investigating, but it is certain that the Korean expert who is now raving when these international standards were formulated was at that time. Not all of his 361 degrees
It can be seen from this that his statement is untenable. The WHO has also reiterated that the current acupuncture standards are indeed formulated mostly by adopting Chinese standards. This is a fact that cannot be denied by any person, organization or country.
I wonder if it has helped you, the poster? I wrote it myself, there is absolutely no plagiarism, the content is true, please give me a hard fee if you don’t accept it.