First answer your first question. According to the supervision procedure, the public notice procedure and the bankruptcy and debt repayment procedure of enterprise legal person, these special procedures are not applicable to retrial, because they directly solve procedural problems. If the judgment is wrong, the parties can solve it through ordinary civil litigation. In the case that the original judgment is upheld after trial according to the trial supervision procedure, the parties may not apply for retrial, because retrial is strictly restricted to save litigation resources, but it is not absolutely forbidden at the same time, otherwise the misjudged cases in some cases will not be corrected. It can also be retried under certain conditions, so there is a saying that "the retrial applicant or the retrial person refuses to accept it": "But the retrial applicant or the complainant puts forward new reasons, It also complies with Article 24 of the Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China, Article 179 of the Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China, Article 62 of the Administrative Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China, Articles 7 and 8 of these Provisions, Article 62 of the Administrative Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China and Articles 7, 8 and 9 of these Provisions. Generally speaking, these two provisions do not conflict. What does not conflict is how the old and new laws are applied. next is the second question. If the court of first instance hears a case of first instance, then this case is the final case of first instance, and the judgment takes effect directly. If the judgment is wrong, you can't appeal, but you can try again.
lawyer Liang Wei, QQ: 289284216.