The reason for this is that the author's evidence catalogue usually adds the words "so-and-so law firm, so-and-so lawyer" in the header and footer, and can also have contact information, e-mail, WeChat and other contents (especially for some audio-visual evidence, as well as indictments, etc. , so that the judges can get it by email when they need it). Supplementing this information often helps to enhance the judge's impression of lawyers, helps the parties to understand the work of lawyers, and is also a way for individuals to introduce themselves. But the contents of the notes should be as few as possible and concise, so that others can see them at a glance and remember them at once. It is not appropriate to do too much personal publicity, so as not to usurp the host's role and make the evidence catalogue itself less rigorous and serious.
Two, the list of evidence can be marked according to the litigation stage.
For example, if it is the first trial stage, you can write a "list of evidence in the first trial", for the second trial, retrial, retrial and so on. If there are many trials in the first instance, you can write a "list of evidence in the first instance", and submit different lists of evidence according to different stages of litigation, so that the judge can see it at a glance and the opposing lawyer can see it clearly, which is not only a respect for the opposing party and the court, but also a way to improve the trial efficiency and reflect the quality of lawyers.
Three, provide a complete list of evidence at different stages of litigation, and use bold or other font changes to reflect the new evidence.
In the course of litigation, a lot of evidence is not submitted at one time. At different stages of litigation, relevant evidence can be added, subtracted or supplemented according to the needs of the trial and the changes of the opposing party's evidence and even the changes of the litigation request. When the evidence changes, it is advisable to resubmit the evidence list, and highlight and explain the relevant changes in the evidence list by means of bolding, font change, underline or font color change.
Four, distinguish the types of evidence, write down the source of evidence, whether it is the original, etc.
For example, there are documentary evidence, physical evidence, witness testimony, audio-visual materials, statements of the parties, etc. When writing the name of evidence, it is advisable to clearly indicate the type of evidence, which will help the judge to know whether it is legal evidence or not and facilitate the judge's legal review of evidence.
For the sources of evidence, some are submitted by our clients, and some are obtained from third parties, such as a company (such as a bank) or an institution (such as an industrial and commercial bureau or a police station), it is necessary to write a complete and accurate name of the institution so that the judge can verify it when necessary.
Some evidence is the original documentary evidence, some is the copy of documentary evidence, some is the original physical evidence, but some are physical photos, and some audio-visual materials are copied and re-burned, which should also be marked in the evidence catalogue.
A copy shall be submitted at the time of filing the case, and if there is an original at the time of trial, a new catalogue of evidence shall be revised accordingly.
Five, the evidence should be grouped, you can distinguish each group in the large evidence group, and make the corresponding evidence number.
For example, sales contracts, some parties have signed several sales contracts, and the evidence should be grouped and classified according to the types of products and the signing time of the contracts. For example, "there are three or two mobile phone sales contracts and two mobile phone accessories sales contracts", and the two evidences are sorted by time, such as "evidence three-1" and "evidence three -2". Of course, if the amount of evidence is small and easy to explain, it can also be handled simply.