Is it legal for the other party to talk to me with a lawyer?

Legal analysis: Whether it is legal for the other party to talk to his client with a lawyer depends on the situation: 1. If the conversation between the two sides does not mention sensitive content and does not forcibly interfere with the trading behavior of the disputed content between the two sides, then the conversation in this case is legal; 2. It is illegal for both parties to accept entrustment privately, collect fees, accept the property or other benefits of the client, accept the property or other benefits of the other party, and maliciously collude with the other party or a third party to infringe on the rights and interests of the client.

Legal basis: Decision of NPC Standing Committee on Amending the Lawyers Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) Article 40 Lawyers shall not commit the following acts in their practice: (1) accepting entrustment, charging fees, accepting property or other benefits from clients without permission; (two) to seek the disputed rights and interests of the parties by taking advantage of providing legal services; (3) accepting property or other benefits from the other party, and maliciously colluding with the other party or a third party to infringe upon the rights and interests of the client; (4) Meeting with judges, prosecutors, arbitrators and other relevant staff in violation of regulations; (5) bribing judges, prosecutors, arbitrators and other relevant staff members, introducing bribes or instigating or inducing parties to pay bribes, or otherwise influencing judges, prosecutors, arbitrators and other relevant staff members to handle cases according to law; (six) intentionally providing false evidence or threatening or inducing others to provide false evidence, so that the other party can not legally obtain evidence; (seven) inciting or instigating the parties to take illegal means such as disturbing public order and endangering public security to resolve disputes; (8) Disrupting the order of courts and arbitration tribunals and interfering with the normal conduct of litigation and arbitration activities.