1. Nian Bin case
1. Handing Nian Bin to the defender when there is insufficient evidence is unfair to Nian Bin on the one hand, and it also misses the best opportunity to continue to solve the case and reveal the truth. , and the murderer cannot yet be identified.
2. In December 2015, Nian Bin filed an application for state compensation with the Fuzhou Intermediate People’s Court, requesting the Fuzhou Intermediate People’s Court to compensate Nian Bin for infringement of personal freedom, medical expenses, solatium for mental damage and other material losses. . The total amount is RMB 15,321,605.15. In the "Nian Bin case", the state compensation was finally settled, with a compensation of more than 1.19 million yuan.
3. "Nian Bin Case": On the evening of July 27, 2006, two villagers from No. 17 Aoqian Village, Pingtan County, Fujian Province developed symptoms of poisoning, and two children died after rescue efforts failed. After investigation, the police quickly determined that the cause was man-made poisoning, and his neighbor Nian Bin was suspected of committing a major crime. Since then, the case has been held in court 10 times over 8 years, and Nian Bin has been sentenced to death 4 times. On August 22, 2014, the Fujian Provincial High Court acquitted Nian Bin.
2. Case History
On the evening of July 27, 2006, the couple Ding Yunxia 17 of Aoqian Village, Pingtan County, Fujian Province had dinner with Chen Yanjiao’s family. At about 10 o'clock that night, Ding Yunxia's 10-year-old son Yu Pan and 8-year-old daughter Yu Yue developed symptoms such as abdominal pain, headache, vomiting, and convulsions one after another. They were later diagnosed as dead by food poisoning after being rescued by doctors. After receiving the call, the police rushed to the scene, declared the case a "man-made poisoning", and filed a criminal complaint that day. On July 30, 2006, the police detected the toxic component "fluoroacetic acid" in the deceased's vomit and vomitus, and determined that the deceased died of fluoroacetic acid poisoning. His neighbor Nian Bin was suspected of committing a major crime. According to the case file provided by the police, Nian Bin's motive for poisoning was that on the evening of July 26, 2006, a customer came to buy cigarettes and was called to her store by Ding Yunxia (both of them opened a grocery store). In the heart, he stole Nian Bin's business and wanted to teach Ding Yunxia a lesson. Early the next morning, rat poison was poured into a neighbor's aluminum pot, causing two deaths and four injuries.
It is understood that Nian Bin is preparing to apply for state compensation. Regarding whether being listed as a criminal suspect will affect the application for state compensation, Hong Daode said that the application process for state compensation can proceed normally. Unless the public security organs have sufficient evidence and Nian Bin enters criminal proceedings again, the court may temporarily not accept state compensation.