1, whether the evidence is true and sufficient is precisely the focus of criminal defense lawyers' work in examining, judging and using evidence. Without contact with the substantive evidence of the case, lawyers can't determine whether they are innocent or guilty, and they can't predict the final outcome of the judgment. The good outcome is made, not predicted out of thin air. For the details of the specific acts proved in the evidence materials, the investigation organs and procuratorial organs will interpret the legal attributes from the perspective of accusations, while the defense lawyers will interpret the legal attributes from the perspective of defense. Which interpretation method the court finally adopts depends on which interpretation is more reasonable. 2. Entrusted a criminal defense lawyer specializing in criminal defense business for the first time. Criminal defense is a process, a step-by-step process of specific work with the examination, judgment and application of criminal evidence as the core. Lawyers are professionals, and like doctors, they specialize in civil and criminal defense. Therefore, it is necessary to entrust a criminal defense lawyer who specializes in criminal defense business.
Legal objectivity:
Article 20 of the Procedure for Public Hearing of Criminal Appeal Cases shall invite hearing officers, and the number of hearing officers participating in the hearing shall be an odd number of three or more. Article 21 The hearing shall be held according to the following procedures: (1) The host announces the beginning of the hearing; Announce the list of hearing officers and other participants, the rights and obligations enjoyed by the complainant and his entrusted agent, and the hearing discipline. (two) the host introduced the basic situation of the case and the hearing topics. (3) The complainant, other parties to the original case and their entrusted agents state the facts, reasons and basis. (four) the original case undertaker and the original review case undertaker explain the facts and legal basis of the original decision and the original review decision, and produce relevant evidence. Review the relevant evidence obtained by the case undertaker in supplementary investigation.