1974 occurred in Happy Valley, Hong Kong. In the absence of witnesses, the court convicted the suspect on the basis of "scientific verification", but the suspect insisted that he did not kill anyone. The motive and process of crime is still a mystery. This case caused a sensation and became one of the top ten strange cases in Hong Kong.
1974 In February, the girl should be buried in a cardboard box, so the police set up an ad hoc group and began to investigate with scientific evidence. It coincides with the pressure of ICAC and the police's eagerness to solve the case, and this case has gradually become the focus of investigation. Because of the location and time of the crime, plus the evidence of scientific monitoring, Qiang became a suspect and had no alibi, so Qiang was sentenced to death.
His wife Feng firmly believed that her husband was innocent, but she still insisted that her husband was innocent, but she was still convicted. After conviction, Feng had to face various pressures and burdens, and was later trafficked. Fortunately, with the guidance of female journalists and the assistance of lawyers, Feng tried to appeal for her husband and failed again and again.
Story background
The case of hiding a corpse in a cardboard box is a crime of 1974+02+06 in Hong Kong. Bian, then 16-year-old girl, arrived in Happy Valley by tram, borrowed her mobile phone from Anmei Ice Cream Company, and was killed. The next day, Bian was found naked in the street, hidden in the box of the TV.
On 1975, the police arrested Bingqiang Ouyang, a China native who worked in an ice cream company at the time of the crime, and accused him of murder. Bingqiang Ouyang was found guilty and sentenced to death.
This is the first murder case in Hong Kong that has been scientifically verified and convicted without witnesses. Bingqiang Ouyang, the criminal suspect, stressed from beginning to end that "I didn't kill anyone, I was wronged". Bingqiang Ouyang's wife, Zhang Jinfeng, repeatedly appealed to her husband's Queen's Counsel Bernacchi and barrister Tang Jiahua, hoping to get a chance to get rid of the crime. The lawsuit went to the Privy Council in London, but it still failed.