Applicant: Wang xx, male, Han nationality, born on 19xx, living in xx, Dali. The applicant refuses to accept the criminal judgmentNo. of the criminal incidental civil judgment, and the people's court of xx, XX province, and XX city, and according to the provisions of Article 182 of the Criminal Procedure Law, the applicant lodged a protest with your hospital. The reasons are as follows: First, the first-instance judgment of felony is relatively light, and the application of criminal law is obviously inappropriate. Defendants Zhang xx and Ji xx intentionally hurt the applicant, and the means were extremely cruel, the nature was extremely bad, the consequences were extremely serious, and the subjective malignancy was extremely deep, which should be severely punished according to law. On July 4, 2005, the two men, together with Meng xx, Sun xx and Zhang xx, carried chop, pick, stick, arm and other weapons. First, I went to the slaughterhouse in Ganggou Town to collect debts for others. That night, I deliberately made trouble at the crime scene and tried to blackmail others. Then the killer chopped the candidate seriously. Its arrogance of wanton harm to society has reached an outrageous level. After the incident, the two men fled the public security organs for two years, not only intending to escape criminal sanctions, but also causing extremely unstable factors to social security in various places. The defendant Zhang xx even showed off many times that "the cut was beautiful and the brains came out". For this kind of criminals, it is not enough to reflect the principle of adapting crime to punishment in our criminal law without severe punishment; Not severely punishing is not enough to combat the arrogance of criminals; Without severe punishment, the misfortune suffered by the applicant cannot be alleviated. Second, the first-instance judgment found that the facts were unclear and the probation was wrong. The judgment held that the defendant Ji xx played a small role in the crime of * * *, so probation was applied to him. The above determination is contrary to the facts. At the time of committing the crime, the defendant Ji xx first took out the seal from the car and handed it to Zhang xx, and then asked Meng xx, Sun xx and others to "go up". Visible, in the whole process of * * * accomplice, Ji xx plays a leading role in organization and leadership, and is the core figure of * * * accomplice! More importantly, in the process of committing the crime, it was Ji xx who cut the applicant and another victim with * * * *; In the last section, xx dumped the application on the beer barrel with a chop, and Zhang xx chopped the applicant seriously. Therefore, Ji xx is not only an organization and leader, but also an active participant and concrete implementer of * * * * crime. In this case, the two defendants should not be divided into master and servant, and should be severely punished. It is even more wrong to apply probation to the defendant. 3. Defendants Zhang xx and Ji xx retracted their confessions in court, so they should not be deemed to have a good attitude of pleading guilty and should be severely punished according to law. After the incident, the two defendants absconded for more than two years without remorse, colluded with each other and refused to plead guilty. Even at the trial, they were lucky enough to avoid talking about the main criminal facts and refused to admit the main criminal circumstances. Defendant Zhang xx denied cutting the applicant's head in court; Ji xx even refused to admit the fact that he chopped the applicant. The two defendants refused to plead guilty to the main crime, and it was obviously wrong to find that their guilty attitude was good in the first instance. Four, two defendants refused to compensate the applicant for economic losses, should be severely punished according to law. By the time the verdict was pronounced in the first instance, the defendant and his family had no remorse, not only did they not visit the victim, but also did not show the slightest sincerity in the mediation process presided over by the court. The applicant has not received any compensation. The 50,000 yuan and 20,000 yuan submitted by the two people to the court are nothing more than crying cats and catching mice and fooling the law! It is not compensation paid to the applicant at all, but an excuse to confess and pretend to be willing to pay compensation in order to achieve the real purpose of "spending money to buy punishment". The defendant's criminal behavior caused extremely serious personal and mental damage to the applicant and his family. The direct loss that can only be measured by money has reached more than 660,000 yuan. However, the two defendants and their families ignored the applicant's pain, not only refused to pay compensation, but tried every means to exploit legal loopholes. Compared with the losses suffered by the applicants, the 70,000 yuan they paid to the court was really nine Niu Yi cents. If such a guilty attitude can be used as a sentencing circumstance of a lighter punishment, it is really a shame of the law, a farce of the society, and the sorrow of the victims! To sum up, the applicant believes that the first-instance judgment found the facts unclear, the applicable law was wrong, and the sentencing was improper. I hereby lodge a protest with your hospital. To the applicant of xx People's Procuratorate: In XXX civil cases, under normal circumstances, as long as the parties do not take the initiative to request the state judicial organs, the state judicial organs generally do not interfere in disputes between the parties. The application must be concise and focus on the core content. If you don't know the law, you'd better find a professional lawyer to help you.
Legal objectivity:
Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China
Article 232
Local people's procuratorates at all levels shall lodge a protest against the judgment or ruling of first instance of the people's court at the same level through the people's court that originally tried the case, and send a copy of the protest to the people's procuratorate at the next higher level. The people's court that originally tried the case shall transfer the protest together with the case file and evidence to the people's court at the next higher level and send a copy of the protest to the parties. If the people's procuratorate at a higher level thinks that the protest is improper, it may withdraw the protest from the people's court at the same level and notify the people's procuratorate at a lower level.