Generally speaking, the evidence obtained by the court is also evidence, and the evidence can only be used as evidence after cross-examination by both parties. Cross-examination is a legal procedure in civil litigation. Article 64 of the Civil Procedure Law stipulates that "the people's court shall comprehensively and objectively examine and verify the evidence in accordance with legal procedures". Article 66 stipulates that "evidence shall be presented in court and cross-examined by the parties". It can be seen that the court's debate and cross-examination of evidence is a legal procedure for reviewing evidence and an important guarantee for the authenticity of evidence. Any evidence that has not been cross-examined can not be used as the basis for deciding a case, and the evidence obtained by the people's court ex officio is no exception. Generally speaking, in criminal cases, when there is a dispute over the necessity of examining arrest and detention, whether to prosecute, the fact finding or the application of law in criminal complaints, and the specific handling of the case, the prosecutor may hold a hearing after the approval of the chief procurator. After the announcement, the trial will be arranged according to the date on the summons. If the defendant does not attend the trial, he may be absent from the trial. It should be noted that the judgment may not take effect until it is announced. There are great disputes in fact finding, law application and case handling. Or has a significant social impact and needs to listen to the opinions of the parties and other relevant personnel face to face.
Closed-door trial is also a kind of "openness", which gives lawyers the opportunity to communicate formally with prosecutors on formal occasions and through formal procedures. Formal and good communication should be the most powerful weapon for lawyers to defend and find out the facts of the case. The so-called hearing is the "trial" in the stage of examination and prosecution, and the defense space of the defender has been promoted. I have always insisted that the best way to achieve justice is to promote justice openly. Even a closed-door trial is a kind of "openness", which gives lawyers the opportunity to formally communicate with the case handlers on formal occasions through formal procedures. Formal and good communication should be the most effective weapon to find out the facts of the case.