If the defendant or criminal defense lawyer wants to be serious, he will make it clear to the court that these things should have been handed in before the trial, so as to prepare the thesis defense in advance. Now these things are submitted temporarily, and the court should be allowed to give them a few days to reply. If it is proposed to increase the defense period, which is a relatively existing provision, the court will generally allow the next court session to discuss the corresponding issues. Generally, the appellee or the third party habitually sets the deadline for thesis defense. Because the appellee is generally an administrative unit, the burden of proof is great, so the thesis defense has basically not changed much.
Most of them are "the procedures for making administrative acts are legal, the evidence is indeed sufficient, the evaluation evidence is conclusive, and the applicable law is appropriate". Therefore, many papers were submitted in the defense time before the trial. The advantages of fully preparing a written thesis defense are: sorting out your own strategies in advance and writing well in a way that the presiding judge can easily understand. Experienced people know that thinking and saying are not the same thing, and thinking and painting and writing carambola are not the same thing.
If there is no written defense, it is usually much worse to rely on the idea of on-site organization to reply to other people's lawsuits in court. According to my own work experience, the presiding judge usually pays more attention to the opinions of the party whose direct evidence is well prepared and reasonable. Laws and regulations do not stipulate what punishment measures will be taken against the defendant if he fails to submit a reply. In other words, although laws and regulations require you to submit it, as a defendant, you have the right to control it. You can choose to submit or not.