2. With regard to the dispute over the advertising contract between Fang Hongjin and Jinmailang Food Co., Ltd., as one of Fang Hongjin's attorneys, Haidian District Court ruled that Jinmailang Food Co., Ltd. paid the plaintiff Beijing Aowei Times Advertising Media Co., Ltd. an advertising fee of 65438 on February 20th, 20 165438. The second instance upheld the original judgment. After Jin lost the case, Haidian Court executed the case around 20 12 12 1.
3. Regarding the arbitration case of contract dispute between Beijing Hanhe Tongda Film and Television Culture Media Co., Ltd. and Tianjin Panlonggu Culture Development Co., Ltd., under the unfavorable conditions that the applicant Beijing Hanhe Tongda Film and Television Culture Media Co., Ltd. did not have the qualification for commercial performance and the invited third person did not have the qualification for foreign-related commercial performance when performing the contract, after careful preparation, we seized the evidence contradiction of the respondent in court and combined with legal analysis. 20 1 1/Beijing Arbitration Commission made the final award (20 1 1) J.Z.Zi. No.0788 on 201,and the arbitration tribunal unanimously ruled that the contract was valid, and the respondent was Tianjin Panlonggu.
4. With regard to the dispute over the tourism contract between Guiyang Yue Xian Tourism Co., Ltd. and Tianjin Henghua Tourism Co., Ltd., the plaintiff, as the agent of the plaintiff Guiyang Yue Xian Tourism Co., Ltd., changed the claim and reasons in time and asked the other party to continue to perform the contract and payment obligations. The court ruled that the plaintiff won the case.
5. With regard to the case that Guo Xudong, former director of Beijing Xinlian Lily Cultural Exchange Center, was suspected of impersonating a general, after careful preparation and heated debate by lawyers, it was proved that there was no causal relationship between his behavior and the result in criminal law. In the end, Guo Xudong was given a light sentence of one year and seven months by the court (released immediately after the judgment).
6. About dozens of real estate disputes undertaken in Shenzhen before June 5438+00, 2007 due to developers' delay in handling the real estate license, all of them won the case; The case of divorce dispute between Mr. Li and Ms. Ma and the case of dispute with shareholders' right to know of Beijing Jinshengtai Industry and Trade Co., Ltd. were all successful.
7. Regarding Zhou's intentional injury case (causing serious injuries), Haidian Court lightly sentenced the defendant Zhou to probation (the statutory sentencing range is 3- 10 years); Regarding Fan's traffic accident case, Tongzhou court sentenced Fan to three and a half years in prison (the statutory sentencing range is 3-7 years).
8. With regard to the case that a technology company in Shenzhen signed a sales contract with a group company in Nigeria, Mr. Xiao evaded the legal risk of contract fraud amounting to 654.38+0.5 billion yuan through reviewing relevant materials and serious and professional examination.
9. Received many interviews with CCTV, Xinhuanet, Beijing News, Southern Metropolis Daily, Yangcheng Evening News and other major media and networks, and established good cooperative relations.