For this verdict, Ms. Zhu, the wife of the victim "Little Carpenter", told the Beijing Youth Daily reporter that they had been waiting for this result for 23 years. "The law is fair, and this judgment gave an explanation to seven victims and their families."
Rong Zhi Sr was born in 1974. /kloc-When she was 0/8 years old, she graduated from Jiujiang Normal School and was assigned to a school in Jiujiang. Then she met a married woman, Faying, who was 10 years older than her. 1996, old Rong Zhi left Jiujiang with Fa Ziying after leaving his job without pay. From 1996 to 1999, old Rong Zhi and her boyfriend Faziying committed crimes in Nanchang, Guangzhou, Wenzhou, Nanning and Hefei. 1999, Faziying was arrested in the course of committing the crime and executed in the same year. After fleeing for 20 years, Rong Zhi Sr was captured on 20 19.
On the morning of September 9th, 2002/KLOC-0, the case of Lao Rong Zhi was pronounced in the first instance of Nanchang Intermediate People's Court. Our court found through trial that the defendant and Faziying (handled separately) were lovers. From 1996 to 1999, the two conspired to divide the work, and Lao acted as an escort in entertainment places to find the target of the crime. France and Britain committed violence and successively committed robbery, kidnapping and intentional homicide in Nanchang City, Jiangxi Province, Wenzhou City, Zhejiang Province, Changzhou City, Jiangsu Province and Hefei City, Anhui Province. After the incident, old Rong Zhi absconded under the pseudonym of "Shirley" and was arrested and brought to justice by public security personnel on 2019165438+1October 28th.
Nanchang Intermediate People's Court found the defendant guilty of intentional homicide, robbery and kidnapping in the first instance, and decided to execute the death penalty, deprive him of his political rights for life and confiscate all his personal property.
After the verdict, Rong Zhi Sr appealed. The Jiangxi Higher People's Court heard the case in public from August 6, 2038 to August 20, 2022. The facts ascertained in the second instance are consistent with those ascertained in the first instance.
The Higher People's Court of Jiangxi Province held that in the crime of intentional homicide, robbery and kidnapping, Rong Zhi Sr. actively carried out acts such as searching, cheating, binding, guarding, threatening the victim, stepping on the spot, withdrawing money, buying tools for committing crimes, etc., and had a clear division of labor with France and Britain, and cooperated with each other to form a * * *, with strong independence and obvious effects. These two men have committed many crimes for four years. There is no evidence that old Rong Zhi was subjected to mental control and coercion by Fa Ying. Old Rong Zhi also played a major role in the joint crime of * * *, and should be recognized as the principal offender according to law.
The Jiangxi Higher People's Court held that the appellants Lao Rong Zhi and Fa Ying deliberately and illegally deprived others of their lives, which constituted the crime of intentional homicide; Whoever robs another person's property by violence or threat for the purpose of illegal possession constitutes robbery; Kidnapping others for the purpose of extorting property constitutes the crime of kidnapping. Old Rong Zhi's combined punishment for several crimes should be punished according to law. Old Rong Zhi and France and Britain deliberately killed five people; Robbery caused one death, and it was burglary, and the amount of robbery was huge; Kidnapping causes one person to die, the circumstances of the crime are particularly bad, the means are particularly cruel, the consequences and crimes are extremely serious, the subjective malignancy is deep, and the social harm is great, so it should be severely punished according to law. Lao and his defense lawyer mentioned that Lao does not constitute the crime of intentional homicide, but is an accessory and coerced accessory, which is inconsistent with the facts ascertained in the second instance and has no basis in the law and will not be adopted according to law. The facts ascertained in the judgment of first instance are clear, the evidence is true and sufficient, the conviction is accurate and the sentence is appropriate. The trial procedure is legal. The ruling dismissed the appeal and upheld the original judgment. The ruling on the death penalty of old Rong Zhi was submitted to the Supreme People's Court for approval according to law.
Victims' families: After waiting for 23 years, seven victims and their families were given an explanation.
In one case, in the summer of 1999, Yin Mou, a veteran victim, was lured to the rental place, and Fa Ying Ying threatened Yin Mou with a knife, always tying Yin Mou's hands and feet with ropes, and they put Yin Mou in a reinforced cage prepared in advance. In order to force Yin to deliver the property as soon as possible, France and Britain threatened to kill him. Subsequently, Fa Ying tricked Ms. Zhu's husband, a 365,438+0-year-old carpenter, to the rental place and brutally killed him.
After the final verdict, Ms. Zhu told the Beijing Youth Daily reporter that she had been paying attention to the verdict of the case today and was very satisfied with the verdict of the court. "I have been waiting for this result for 23 years. The law is fair and just, and I finally gave an account to the seven victims and their families. "
"They made us so miserable." Ms. Zhu said that in the past few years after her husband was killed, she and her children have been having a hard time. She has been cleaning in the hotel to make a living at home. "I broke my bone while working in the field this year and have been resting at home."
The carpenter's daughter also sent a short video saying that she finally waited for this day, believed in the fairness and justice of the law, and gave her father an explanation.