Liu Hailong was killed in Kunshan. Did Yu Haiming's behavior belong to self-defense?

A hacking incident has attracted the attention of all walks of life, because in this case, the deceased was the first person to commit a crime, and Yu Haiming, who hacked to death, was actually the victim from the beginning. That is to say, after being chopped by the deceased, Yu Ming completed the counter-killing. From a legal point of view, it belongs to self-defense, because the deceased started it. In order to protect his own safety, he had to grab a knife and chop someone to death.

At that time, Liu Hailong was driving on the road, but he drank a lot before driving, which was drunk driving. While driving, Yu Hailong suddenly turned the car into a non-motorized vehicle lane, while Yu Haiming in the rear rode a bicycle and didn't have time to brake, so he ran into a BMW, and they had a quarrel. During the quarrel, Yu Hailong directly took out the powerful control knife carried with the vehicle and cut it at Yu Hailong. He was cut in many places. In the process of chopping people, Liu Hailong threw the knife out directly because of his great strength. With a genial smile, Yu Haiming grabbed the knife and began to fight back.

Yu Haiming will definitely be more excited after being cut, so he will definitely kill people without hesitation after grabbing the knife. This is man's instinct to protect himself. In this case, Liu Hailong lost his life because of his own murder. Yu Haiming's behavior does not constitute murder, but it is entirely out of self-protection. The reason why this case can attract social attention is that few criminal cases in China are exempted from punishment because of self-defense. The verdict of this case has a good reference significance for the trial of other similar cases, which can be said to be a progress in the judicial field of our country.

Due to the high degree of social concern and the complexity of the case, a multi-party joint trial was conducted, and it was agreed that his behavior belonged to self-defense. This case also tells us that when someone causes fatal harm to us, we must fight back without hesitation.