It is often heard that judges turn to lawyers. Why can't the court keep people? Although the salary, welfare and treatment of judges are not low, why are some teachers unwilling to be admitted? There is a reason for this, and we cannot generalize whether we are willing or unwilling. Everyone knows that judges are civil servants. First of all, they give people the impression that their income is high and stable, and their reputation is good and glorious. Teachers have no system, that is to say, the state does not support them, and they have to earn their own wages. The more you earn, the more you earn. Therefore, for young lawyers who are not well-known, they are still willing to take the examination of judges. The question is whether the judge wants you or not! Of course, for lawyers with long working years, rich professional knowledge, rich practical experience and high reputation, will judges be rare in terms of income and freedom of work? Of course not.
It is often heard that judges turn to lawyers. Why can't the court keep people? I'm a lawyer. I won't go if the court invites me. Quite simply, the judge's work is too busy. Each judge handles hundreds of cases every year. According to the working day, two cases are judged on average every day. This kind of work is not a little bigger than that of a lawyer. Lawyers are used to being free. They can spend time with their families and children whenever they want, and they can arrange their own time reasonably. But the judge is different. They have to go to work on weekdays, and overtime is a common occurrence. Many lawyers are unwilling to accept this way of working and sleeping. It is often heard that judges turn to lawyers. Why can't the court keep people?
It is often heard that judges turn to lawyers. Why can't the court keep people? Let's not talk about work income. Civil servants have cancelled many benefits, so they should be careful when eating and drinking, so as not to affect the national image. In recent years, many judges have jumped ship to become lawyers, and some lawyers have become judges, but very few. In most cases, the court threw an olive branch to senior lawyers, promising senior positions and generous treatment, also to make up for the vacancy of the continuous loss of judges.