Legal analysis: (1) The judicial concept needs to be further improved. Mainly manifested in the lack of active visits to contact enterprises, the gap between the ability to solve contradictions within and between enterprises through handling cases and the needs of the masses, the lack of mature and effective ways and means to deal with new types and new fields of economic crimes, and the lack of long-term mechanism to contact and serve enterprises. (2) There are still judicial irregularities in the handling of enterprise-related cases. Mainly manifested in the excellent tone when handling cases, irregular dress, incomplete legal documents, single work form of receiving enterprise personnel to visit, insufficient explanation of litigation rights in enterprise-related cases, insufficient listening to enterprise lawyers' opinions, and legal publicity and crime prevention work to be further carried out. (3) The judicial style is not solid enough. Mainly manifested in the awareness of serving enterprises and serving the overall situation needs to be further strengthened. There is still a gap in the ability and level of accepting corporate supervision through modern and informational forms such as the Internet and WeChat. The consciousness of actively learning new laws and regulations in the field of economic crimes needs to be improved, and the enthusiasm for handling enterprise-related cases is not high.
Legal basis: People's Republic of China (PRC) Criminal Law.
Thirtieth companies, enterprises, institutions, organs, organizations to commit acts that endanger society, the law stipulates that a unit commits a crime, and shall bear criminal responsibility.
Article 31 If a unit commits a crime, it shall be fined, and the directly responsible person in charge and other directly responsible personnel shall be punished. Where there are other provisions in the specific provisions of this Law and other laws, those provisions shall prevail.