Pupils sell things at school and collect money from their classmates.

Pupils look at game cards in small shops.

phenomenon

Store credit sales generally do not exceed 10 yuan.

Urban resident

"It is unreasonable to give credit to children."

Teacher Tang said that it is not appropriate to give a minor credit without parents' permission. Now many parents don't give pocket money to primary school students. It's not that their family lacks that money, nor that they are stingy and unwilling to give their children pocket money. Instead, I am worried that children will buy things indiscriminately, especially what they eat in their stomachs. Because students themselves lack judgment, they only know what is delicious and interesting, or what their classmates buy. It is heartless for a canteen to use children's cognitive ability to make money.

Teacher Liang said, give students credits. In the long run, the more credit you get, the less children dare to tell their parents, and it is prone to petty theft. Shopkeepers should inform parents of students' credit.

Teacher Zhao said that it is a sin not to stop some things. It is wrong for the store to give him extra points for his limited thoughts. Give him credit at most once, or the relevant department can take care of it.

lawyer

Although primary school students are underage, they have certain behavioral abilities.

Lawyer Wang of Gansu Law Firm said that according to relevant laws and regulations, minors under 18 are persons with limited capacity for civil conduct, and minors under 8 are persons without capacity for civil conduct. In other words, minors over the age of eight have certain civil capacity, such as buying pencil boxes and erasers, which can be handled by themselves. So this civil act is effective. Since the child has earned credits, it should be solved by the parents after the child tells the parents. If a child does something beyond his capacity for civil conduct, such as a second-grade elementary school student, asking for money to give a gift to the network anchor, it can be revoked because he can't judge the legal consequences. Therefore, according to the law, minors with limited capacity for civil conduct effectively engage in civil acts within their cognitive scope, and beyond their cognitive scope, it is uncertain (parental ratification is valid and parental opposition is invalid). Parents should bear the obligation of repayment for the low-standard and low-amount credit behavior of the canteen. In addition, it is not the owner's fault that students are only given credit from the canteen. As for children's credit and stealing money at home, this is caused by poor communication between parents and children. Parents should educate their children and communicate with them in time to avoid such things.

netizen

Educational scholar

Stationery stores and small shops are legal but unreasonable.

comment

Some of the credit is too unkind.

Credit is a normal business behavior in the market economy. However, once you hook up with some people, there will be some unusual smells. For example, if you hook up with a minor, you can smell the copper smell on some people. Because the traditional credit is based on the trust relationship and repayment ability between merchants and consumers, one is willing to fight and the other is willing to suffer, so you can often see the notice that "small shops are small profits but quick turnover, and credit is not allowed". For minors who are immature in mind and have no ability to pay their debts at all, it is probably the result of deliberate inducement by merchants.

In fact, it is not a case that the canteen at the school gate gives credit to minors. If you search online, you can find it all over the world. Of course, for this practice, some stores claim that this is a "tacit understanding" between parents and stores. Some parents have made it clear that they are willing to let their children "buy first and then return". However, many cases exposed online show that there is often no "tacit understanding" between parents and shopkeepers. Moreover, the money that shopkeepers gave to some students on credit far exceeded their parents' expectations.

In order to make money, giving credit to minors who are unable to pay their debts will objectively mislead children's views on consumption and money, especially forcing them to embark on the "crooked road" of stealing in order to pay their debts, which will seriously affect the healthy growth of minors and be harmful to children's growth. Some commentators said: From primary school students' credit canteens to college students' peer-to-peer loans, this situation is caused by parents' infinite connivance and doting, which makes children have no correct consumption concept and want whatever they want, regardless of whether they can afford it or not, and regardless of whether they bear the consequences. Second, in order to earn "black money", some lawless people in society break through the bottom line of social principles and induce and deceive irrational consumption of underage teenagers.

Perhaps, some people will say that some of these comments are online. Yes, if you have pencils, exercise books, etc. It doesn't matter to get credits occasionally, and parents will understand. But if you give children credit every once in a while to induce them to buy snacks and toys, it's a bit dark. Besides, if your parents refuse to repay the loan, will you go to court? In the end, the manufacturers themselves suffer. It should be pointed out that if substandard food and toys are harmful to children's health, parents can not only refuse to pay the bill, but also have the right to demand compensation from the owner.

It's not easy to earn money, and it's even harder to raise children. Some things are best not to do. Of course, this requires the joint efforts of the whole society.

Ma Xiao flying knife

Related Questions and Answers: Related Questions and Answers: What if there are many acquaintances in the village when opening a shop in the countryside? Thank you for inviting me.

It's a good thing that many acquaintances who set up shop in the countryside always pay on credit.

As the saying goes, "People are familiar with a treasure", and acquaintances often patronize your store, which is a support for you to open a store and should be welcomed. As for the credit, I think it is the trust in you. First of all, credit and default are not the same concept. Everyone in rural areas and hometown has a hard time. When they are in trouble, they come to you because they think their mouths will not fall, which is also a kind of trust.

"Many acquaintances always pay on credit" is both a bad thing and a good thing. Why do you say that? First of all, this is a bad thing. Total credit may make your funds inoperable. A good thing is how to turn this bad thing into a good thing. Take the opening of non-staple food tobacco and liquor hotels in rural areas as an example. When farming is busy, villagers always go to credit for some daily necessities such as alcohol and tobacco, and these accounts are not easy to get. So I suggest you build a tobacco hotel, and at the same time, you also make a grain purchase, and then pay the bill at home when the grain is collected, thus solving the difficult problem. I got my credit account back, and I made money. I also made money from the recycled grain, and I made money from both. I also have a good relationship with acquaintances. Why not do it?

Therefore, "many acquaintances who open stores in their hometown in rural areas always pay credit" should not blindly stop paying credit, but should turn the unfavorable idea of paying credit into a favorable one. What did you say?/Sorry? !