Generally speaking, civil litigation is "who advocates, who gives evidence", only when there is special infringement (such as environmental pollution disputes, medical disputes, etc.). ) The evidence can be inverted.
Generally speaking, administrative litigation is the inversion of evidence, and the plaintiff only needs to push the lawsuit. Only in the administrative examination and approval of application nature, the plaintiff should provide some evidence for his application behavior.
In criminal proceedings, the evidence is usually given by the public prosecution agency or the private prosecution plaintiff, and the defendant has no burden of proof. However, because China has not implemented the right to silence system, under certain circumstances, the defendant also bears a certain burden of proof. In other words, China's principle of presumption of innocence is not complete.
I think other differences are subtle and have no practical value.