So if you can prove that you claimed the right to the debtor during the limitation of action, the limitation of action will be recalculated. In addition, in litigation, if the other party does not defend beyond the limitation of action, the court will not take the initiative to apply the limitation of action to reject the claim.
The role of prosecution for non-payment of money
Before the prosecution, it is necessary to pay court fees, acceptance fees and other fees as well as lawyers' lawyers' fees.
1. If the other party has property, provide property clues, apply for property protection through litigation, and then apply for enforcement, so that you can obtain your legal property reasonably and legally.
2. If the other party has no property, the other party does have no property, but the debt relationship can be clarified through litigation. When the other party has money, it can be recovered in time. But you can apply to the court for enforcement, and even get compensation at a certain interest rate. You can still get your money back.
3. It can form a certain legal deterrent to those who owe money and urge them to pay back the money as soon as possible.
In the process of litigation, you need to provide a complete chain of evidence. If you can't get it yourself, you can ask a lawyer to help you solve it.
Extended data:
Cases of borrowing money and not paying it back:
I didn't write an iou.
Repeated non-payment of dunning
In September last year, Zhao Long (a pseudonym) borrowed 50,000 yuan from his friend Li Yang (a pseudonym) because of his poor business capital turnover, and said that he would pay Li Yang back two months later. Because he is a good friend, Li Yang didn't ask for written evidence. Subsequently, Li Yang remitted 50,000 yuan to Zhao Long's personal account.
As soon as the two-month loan period came, Li Yang urged Zhao Long to borrow money, but Zhao Long repeatedly shirked it, which made Li Yang feel embarrassed. In desperation, Li Yang had to ask a lawyer for help. Because Zhao Long borrowed money from Li Yang, leaving no evidence. First, Zhao Long should admit that borrowing does exist.
At the lawyer's suggestion, Li Yang came to Chengdu Notary Office to notarize the telephone recording. But when Li Yang called Zhao Long in front of the notary, because Zhao Long was working on the construction site, the telephone recording could not be heard clearly at all, and the expected purpose could not be achieved.
Li Yang was at a loss, so he asked the notary if he could do short message security notarization. That is, Li Yang sent a short message to Zhao Long, as evidenced by Zhao Long's reply. The notary told Li Yang that the evidence preservation related to SMS is collectively referred to as "SMS preservation" notarization. The way that Li Yang just proposed is called "static SMS security".
However, with the development of modern social technology, the stored SMS may be edited and modified again. Therefore, the effect of "static SMS security" is relatively low, and the notary can only prove the SMS and related information in the mobile phone (or SIM card). If Li Yang wants to prove the fact that Zhao Long borrowed money from himself, he needs to assist other evidence to improve his probative power. But obviously, Li Yang has no other evidence.
People's Daily Online-Sue a friend for not paying back the money. There are only three loan phone records.
People's Network-No debt, no loan and no guarantee. SMS can be used as evidence.
People's Network-Borrowing money will not be prosecuted. Wechat recorded it as evidence.