The male leader involved in the Alibaba female employee case is not guilty. Here is the answer from industry lawyers.

We see many reports in the news about women being assaulted by gangsters. Women’s bodies are more fragile than men’s, so it’s important to learn to protect yourself. If you are hurt by someone who has done something wrong, you must be brave enough to call the police and protect yourself with legal weapons! No, the news reported a case of a well-known domestic company. A female employee of this company caused an uproar on the Internet when she reported that her leader had engaged in lewd behavior. However, after a close investigation by law enforcement officials, the decision was not to arrest the inexperienced male leader, believing that he did not constitute a crime. So, how do lawyers in the industry answer this matter? After carefully reviewing relevant articles, the author found that the lawyers responded as follows: First, they think the degree is not enough. Second, consider the result to be legal and reasonable. First, the level is not enough.

If we read the ins and outs of the news carefully, you will find that the female employee reported rape to her leader in real name. However, after extensive investigation by law enforcement officials, it was discovered that the female employee’s description was inconsistent with the facts. This is because the male leader did not engage in substantive coercive behavior. The definitions of forcing women to do things are different from that of indecency. One of the core standards is that the former is very serious and the latter is much lighter. The two degrees are different, so they do not constitute a crime. After all, the two degrees are different. Second, it is legal and reasonable.

No matter what the final result is, we should always believe in the great law enforcers who serve the people. They cannot take sides, never! Therefore, this result cannot be regarded as the result of people with malicious intentions on the Internet setting the pace and fanning the flames. The whole case is complicated, and law enforcement officers finally reached this result after rigorous and meticulous investigation, which can also provide support for the decision not to arrest. Therefore, no matter from which aspect, this decision is legal and reasonable, supported by responsive evidence and laws and regulations! There is no need for us to allow people with ulterior motives to take advantage of the situation and undermine unity. So if you have anything to say in the end, please leave a message in the comments and discuss it with everyone.