Baoding handles the recommendation of criminal defense lawyers

I believe many people have heard the saying that impulse is the devil. Indeed, it is now a society ruled by law. If people make a mistake on impulse, there will be laws to punish you once they are involved in breaking the law, so everyone must know how to control their emotions. Friends who like to watch the news may have seen such a news. A man in Baoding, Hebei Province saw his brother-in-law stab his sister with a knife, then grabbed a shovel and stopped him. Finally, his brother-in-law was seriously injured and died. Then many people may have such a question, that is, if so, is this person's behavior intentional injury, intentional S-person, or self-defense? Judging from the man's behavior, it is obvious that his act of hitting his brother-in-law with a spade is intentional, but judging from his intention, he is trying to protect his sister. In this case, does the man's behavior belong to self-defense? Next, I will tell you about this matter coldly and see what the court's statement is, because the court's statement is the most authoritative.

In fact, judging from the judgments of the first and second trials of this case, the man's behavior does not belong to justifiable defense, but he thinks that the man's defense is excessive, and according to the results of the first and second trials, the man's act of hitting his brother-in-law with a spade belongs to intentional S-person, so the result of the first trial of this case is that the man committed the crime of intentional S-person, sentenced to six years in prison and deprived of political rights for two years; The result of the second trial was that the man committed the crime of intentional S and was sentenced to 3 years in prison. However, many people actually disapprove of this judgment, because the man's purpose was to protect his sister, and her life was seriously threatened at that time. Therefore, from the legal definition, the man's behavior conforms to the definition of justifiable defense. So many people think that the man's behavior belongs to self-defense. Later, after the media paid attention to this matter, Baoding Intermediate People's Court tried the case again. What was the verdict of the first instance and the second instance? Unclear facts, insufficient evidence and wrong application of law? Then the judgment of the first instance and the second instance was directly revoked. Therefore, from this attitude, the man's behavior belongs to self-defense.

Next, I will explain the legal definition of justifiable defense to you coldly, that is, taking defensive actions against X and S people, robbery, QJ, kidnapping and other violent crimes that seriously endanger personal safety, resulting in unlawful infringement of personal casualties, is not excessive defense and does not bear criminal responsibility. Therefore, from the legal definition, the man's behavior occurred when his brother-in-law stabbed his sister with a knife, which fully conforms to the legal definition of justifiable defense, so the man's behavior belongs to justifiable defense, not intentionally. Finally, I want to say coldly that the law is fair. If you feel that the court's decision is unfair, you can continue to appeal, and you must believe that fairness will always come!