The reason why Asha was sued

I. Reasons for Asha being sued Siping xia was a duet before joining the Internet, but unlike other online celebrities, xia has contract restrictions. Last year, Luo Jinbao revealed that xia had been sued by the original company for this contract.

The real reason why Siping xia was banned was because it provoked an e-commerce. At that time, Asha received the money from the e-commerce, but did not sell the goods to the other party in the live broadcast room. As a result, e-commerce was dissatisfied with Asha, and after the negotiation failed. In a rage, the e-commerce reported Asha to the TV station, which led to his final ban.

Second, online e-commerce

Nowadays, the live broadcast of goods has been heated up. On the one hand, there are endless reports of hundreds of millions of sales, and on the other hand, users complain about chaos such as "exaggerated propaganda" and "script hype". The industry of live broadcast with goods actually involves more than just online celebrities. Take the live broadcast platform ks as an example. If you want to sell goods, there are actually two real beneficiaries, one is an online celebrity and the other is an e-commerce.

The relationship between online celebrities and e-commerce has always been subtle. How to win-win cooperation is of course the best, but once you lose money, the contradiction will break out immediately. Some time ago, Eldon's gene was reported to a TV program by more than a dozen e-commerce companies as a "pit fee". Recently, Wu Yi, a well-known e-commerce company on ks, released a video exposure and was cheated by a network celebrity for tens of millions.

The simplest truth: Internet celebrities can only provide traffic. If you want to make money, you have to have e-commerce to provide goods. Internet celebrities are like shopping malls, counters are rented, and e-commerce is a businessman. But when it comes to economic interests, contradictions are inevitable. In addition, some people call the current live broadcast of goods "bubble economy", and the sales on the surface are all fake. In fact, not all online celebrities can sell so many things. We all think that online celebrities are cutting users' leeks. In fact, many online celebrities are cutting merchants' leeks. Others gave the pit space fee, but it didn't sell much, and it was a loss.

Legal basis

People's Republic of China (PRC) Criminal Procedure Law

Article 169 All cases requiring public prosecution shall be examined and decided by the people's procuratorate.

Article 171 When examining a case, a people's procuratorate must ascertain:

(1) whether the facts and circumstances of the crime are clear, whether the evidence is true and sufficient, and whether the nature of the crime and the determination of the charges are correct;

(2) Whether there are any omission crimes and other persons who should be investigated for criminal responsibility;

(3) Whether criminal responsibility should be investigated;

(4) whether there is an incidental civil action;

(5) whether the investigation activity is legal.