This sentence should be understood as follows: the plaintiff in criminal incidental civil action is the prosecutor (that is, the procuratorial organ) and the plaintiff in incidental civil action. The defendant is a criminal suspect.
In the criminal part, the plaintiff is only the procuratorial organ, and the victim is not considered as the plaintiff in the criminal part at this time. But it is not impossible to ask questions to the defendant, but' the victim and his agent ad litem may ask supplementary questions about the interrogation of the public prosecutor with the permission of the presiding judge'.
See the Criminal Procedure Law.
Article 133 Under the auspices of the presiding judge, the public prosecutor may question the defendant about the criminal facts alleged in the indictment; The victim and his agent ad litem may, with the permission of the presiding judge, ask supplementary questions about the interrogation by the public prosecutor; With the permission of the presiding judge, the plaintiff in an incidental civil action, his legal representative and agent ad litem may ask the defendant questions about the facts of the incidental civil action; With the permission of the presiding judge, the defendant's defender, legal representative and agent ad litem may ask the defendant questions after the complainant has finished asking questions on specific issues.
I know id, the law is blind. I'm happy to answer your question.
If you have any questions, please ask.
Please adopt those that have reference value.