Conditions for the inapplicability of criminal summary procedure

Legal analysis: (1) The criminal suspect or defendant is a minor, blind, deaf, dumb or a mental patient who has not completely lost the ability to recognize or control his own behavior; (2) * * * Some criminal suspects and defendants in the same criminal case have objections to the alleged facts, charges and sentencing suggestions; (3) The criminal suspect or defendant pleads guilty, which may not constitute a crime after examination, or the defender does not plead guilty; (four) the defendant has no objection to the sentencing proposal, but after examination, it is considered that the sentencing proposal is improper; (5) The criminal suspect, defendant, victim or his legal representative or near relatives have not reached a mediation or settlement agreement on matters such as compensation for losses, restitution, apology, etc. ; (6) The criminal suspect or defendant violates the provisions on obtaining a guarantor pending trial and residential surveillance, which seriously affects the normal conduct of criminal proceedings; (seven) the criminal suspect or defendant has recidivism, abetting minors to commit crimes and other statutory aggravating circumstances; (eight) other circumstances that are not suitable for the quick ruling procedure.

Legal basis: Article 4 of the Detailed Rules for the Implementation of the Procedure for Speedy Adjudication of Criminal Cases does not apply to cases under any of the following circumstances: (1) The criminal suspect or defendant is a minor, blind, deaf or dumb, or a mental patient who has not completely lost the ability to identify or control his own behavior; (2) * * * Some criminal suspects and defendants in the same criminal case have objections to the alleged facts, charges and sentencing suggestions; (3) The criminal suspect or defendant pleads guilty, which may not constitute a crime after examination, or the defender does not plead guilty; (four) the defendant has no objection to the sentencing proposal, but after examination, it is considered that the sentencing proposal is improper; (5) The criminal suspect, defendant, victim or his legal representative or near relatives have not reached a mediation or settlement agreement on matters such as compensation for losses, restitution, apology, etc. ; (6) The criminal suspect or defendant violates the provisions on obtaining a guarantor pending trial and residential surveillance, which seriously affects the normal conduct of criminal proceedings; (seven) the criminal suspect or defendant has recidivism, abetting minors to commit crimes and other statutory aggravating circumstances; (eight) other circumstances that are not suitable for the quick ruling procedure.