Wang Fei pointed out the irrationality of solving crimes in those years.
First of all, the first one is the question in the confession of that year.
The previous system had some defects. The suspect has been controlled in the same police station of the Interpol Brigade for a long time, facing the same policeman. Although the suspect has always insisted that he is innocent, during the six days and six nights of trial, the confessions of the two were different. One was recorded at the police station, and the transcript emphasized that there was no murder or even seeing the dead. The other one may have been taken when I went out to identify the scene. It will be more convenient without monitoring.
Maybe when we were investigating the case, we always thought that a criminal should not be let go. In the process of trial, we always emphasize how to get the prisoner to confess, but ignore the protection of human rights. As for some relevant information recorded by the suspect in the confession transcript, it has not been investigated and determined in detail.
The second question appeared in court.
At that time, the judicial concept was more about investigating crimes and punishing criminals. The judicial procedure is too clear, and the rights of the parties are easily ignored. When the case was first heard, the Criminal Procedure Law had not been revised. Before 1996, it was not clearly stipulated that prisoners on death row must be equipped with lawyers. At the second trial, the criminal procedure law had been amended, and a lawyer defended the suspect. At that time, a very favorable evidence was submitted to the suspect. Prove that two dead people were seen on the day of the crime 12. It is proved that killing people at home after the point 1 1 mentioned in the certificate does not exist. However, the court ignored it and the evidence was not mentioned in the judgment. At that time, the concept was that lawyers defended suspects in order to get rid of charges, and retraction was unreasonable sophistry. It is impossible to see the facts clearly under the control of this concept. What is even more surprising is that the second trial was not held, which led to the absence of the second trial lawyer. This is the lowest mistake.
Wang Fei believes that all the unjust, false and misjudged cases we found have many problems in procedure. If the procedure is not guaranteed, it means that the rights are not paid due attention, which may easily lead to unclear entity problems, or directly lead to wrong entity identification, and ultimately lead to misjudged cases.