A few days ago, there were two hot news: one was in high-speed railway station, Hefei, where a female teacher was guarding the car door and waiting for her husband; The other is a woman who claims to be a "Yingke female lawyer" to show off her wealth in a circle of friends.
The protagonists in the two news stories, which can be said to be giant babies, have indeed brought negative effects to society. However, the subsequent punishment of the two men aroused my anxiety.
High-speed rail incident:
In the video, Luo just grabbed the train door to stop the train from leaving. Recently, Hefei Railway Police informed the final punishment result of this incident: Luo's behavior was suspected of "illegally intercepting trains and obstructing railway transportation", and the public security organ ordered him to admit his mistake and correct it, and fined him 2,000 yuan.
If you haven't seen the video, you can click on the link to see Luo's "stopping the car" scene.
Anonymous lawyer sends a circle of friends to attract netizens to ridicule:
In the high-speed rail incident, female teachers only saw their own interests and ignored the existence of countless others. It is said that a few minutes delay of a high-speed rail will have a destructive impact on the whole system.
There are many absurd facts about showing off wealth, so it is likely that the poor made a fake, and of course it may also be blowing water in a circle of friends.
The female teacher was punished, and the direct punishment was not enough, only 2000 yuan was fined.
Why "the logic of pan-moralization makes me uneasy"?
What happened next made me a little uneasy.
A female teacher may lose her career completely if she is temporarily suspended. Female lawyers are investigated by the Bar Association and may lose their career as lawyers.
What bothers me is the "pan-moralization logic".
The so-called pan-moralization logic means that since a person is morally wrong, what he says and does is not right.
This is a total denial of a person.
The logic I agree with should be clear: if a person is wrong about A, he should pay the price for A, but it should not be easily extended to B or even the whole person.
It is naturally a big mistake for a female teacher to stop the high-speed rail, and it also violates the law.
This kind of behavior that wants the whole world to revolve around itself is an all-round narcissism.
However, this mistake is A, and her teaching behavior is B. It cannot be easily deduced that she is wrong in A, that is to say, she is also wrong in B.
Those who think that she should be suspended think that she has violated teachers' morality.
Let's talk about teachers' morality.
We have always emphasized being a teacher by example, but if we really want to reach the legendary level of teachers' morality, then teachers are not just teachers, but saints.
Looking forward to the wish that the virgin or virgin is also a giant baby, this is looking for a super nanny.
In fact, too many teachers and friends in primary and secondary schools told me that I felt like a nanny rather than a teacher, which seriously affected my major.
Besides, can the overall moral level of the teaching profession really bear the burden of moral education?
Not to mention now, I don't think teachers in the past can afford to be teachers.
Looking back on my school experience, I met many good teachers, but I also met many bad teachers. Their overall moral standards are really not higher than the average person.
Why do you put such high moral demands on teachers?
In my opinion, it is good for teachers to teach books well, and then it is better not to exploit or abuse children.
I don't want to be a soul engineer. My reputation is too high and my burden is too heavy.
Take Italy for example.
A male math teacher in a university in this country, who loves fitness and has a good figure, suddenly became an online celebrity because students found out that the teacher was gay and made many pornographic movies about homosexuality.
Think about it, how did the students find his pornographic movies? That must have been discovered by a classmate with strong hormones.
After the teacher's past was exposed, his teaching career was not affected.
In fact, he didn't make any money, so he went to the United States to make these adult films to make a living, but when he got a master's degree in mathematics and became a math teacher, he quit this business.
I like this tolerance in Italy.
When I took this example of a male teacher to the internet for discussion, many people said it was nothing. After all, this male teacher didn't break the law, which is his private affair and doesn't affect teaching. A female teacher in Hefei, she violated the law and teachers' morality.
I doubt it very much. It is really acceptable for female teachers to pay special attention to their professional ethics. In your child's class, there is a gay male teacher who has made pornographic films.
I'm talking about a complicated ethical topic. I don't think it should be handled simply. I think the society as a whole is tolerant, but the key is that the law should be clear and powerful. Those acts that harm others and the public, or put them in serious danger, must be punished.
Just, just punish in this category, don't extend it easily.
Without procedural justice and basic tolerance, everyone is in danger.
Let's talk about the "Yingke female lawyer".
First, she is stupid, but that's all;
Second, if PCG investigates her for the company's image, that's good, because the company is protecting its own behavior;
Thirdly, if she has done nothing wrong in the aspect of lawyer, it is better not to deprive her of her lawyer qualification.
Fourth, the most terrible thing about this is the person who exposed her story on Weibo. She's just showing off in her circle of friends. Who would treat her friend like this?
The above is my personal opinion, which has caused great controversy on Weibo, and I believe it will also appear on WeChat, but it's ok. We'd better have all kinds of voices in a public event instead of speaking with one voice.
Finally, I reiterate my position: I hope to live in a relatively tolerant society, just like Italy.
A male middle school teacher, although he has made pornographic films in the past, can continue to be his math teacher because he is a good math teacher.
In fact, we have given too much professional ethics, but many occupations are just occupations. This kind of occupation as a whole is not worthy of this moral expectation, and it is not necessarily necessary.
When pan-moralization is serious, it is difficult to be right or wrong.
In particular, I want to say that controversy is a good thing, because I don't want to live in the feeling that one wrong sentence is dangerous. The whole person who does one wrong thing is not worthy to live in this world. Of course, if you make a mistake, you have to pay the corresponding price.
Finally, it ended with a sentence published by the media person Annabel Lee in Weibo:
Standing on the moral high ground, everyone thought that they would always stand that high. You have no idea how terrible it is to punish them to the extreme. Anyone who lives in society may make mistakes or be cowardly. Without procedural justice and basic tolerance, everyone is in danger.