Can judicial expertise in criminal cases be overturned?

Legal analysis: If the parties have evidence or objections, they can overturn the appraisal conclusion entrusted by one party to the relevant department. If the other party has sufficient evidence to refute and apply for re-appraisal, the people's court shall allow it. You can insist on applying for re-authentication, or you can complain to the judicial administrative organ, so as to revoke the conclusion of illegal judicial authentication. You can also take the initiative to collect other evidence to overturn the expert conclusion, so that the expert conclusion cannot be used as the final evidence.

Legal basis: Article 192 of the Criminal Procedure Law of People's Republic of China (PRC). The public prosecutor, the party concerned, the defender or the agent ad litem have objections to the witness testimony, which has a great influence on the conviction and sentencing of the case. If the people's court deems it necessary for the witness to testify in court, the witness shall testify in court. The provisions of the preceding paragraph shall apply to the people's police who testify in court and testify about the criminal acts they witnessed while performing their duties. If the public prosecutor, the parties, the defenders and the agents ad litem have objections to the expert opinion, and the people's court deems it necessary for the expert to appear in court, the expert shall testify in court. If the appraiser refuses to testify in court after being notified by the people's court, the appraisal opinion shall not be used as the basis for finalizing the case.